So much for Freedom of Speech!

John McCain is the real deal and a hero. It really is shameful the hack job BS videos on this website... McCain makes the rest of the candidates look pathetic!! McCain all the way baby.

I found my posting on this web site and would like to say tanks I was juror 64529 form Kern County. I find it interesting that a person can burn the flag in the streets and it caries no fines or penilties but if you ask the courts about their gold fringe flag addition? The court can be liberal enough to threw 5 day contempt for being loyal to the ((((flag)))).

1. Go to Yahoo.com, Search
Please type in these words then click search.
2. Judges trained to resist the constitution, Anti Government movement handbook.
3. Get the gold fringe off my flag.

Then start asking questions and bitching.

PLEASE HELP US RAISE AWAIRNESS OF KERN COUNTY’S FALSE FLAG WAVING AND DISRESPECT TO JURORS RIGHTS THROUGH OUT THE
U .S.COURTS

When I say the pledge of allegiance to the flag, it never said to the flags. On or about
09-13-2005 a mandatory summons was received by a confidential juror #64529 in the County Of Kern, State of California. As the juror appeared for the official jury summons before the court with the gold fringe flag displayed in the court The juror showed state documents that said, “Currently, the United States Flag is defined as follows: The American Flag of Peace of the United States of America is Red, White, and Blue, with thirteen alternating red and white horizontal stripes and a blue field representing the Union with 50 stars, one to represent each of the several states. The Flag is proportional (1x1.9). This proportion is easily determined by measuring the length (fly), and dividing by the measurement of the with (hoist). The length divided by the width should be very nearly 1.9. If the flag is not to the correct 1x1.9 proportion, it is not an official Title 4 U.S.C.1, 2, American Flag of Peace of the United States of America. The United States Military Flag has a gold Fringe, whitch stands in every State and Federal Court, effectively rendering the Court as a Military Court. "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, ## 1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a Military Flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides .The president of the United States designates this deviation from the regular Flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief. Title 4 U.S.C. 3, provides that anything put on the title 4 U.S.C., 1, 2, American Flag such as gold fringe MUTILATES the flag and carries a one-year prison term. This is confirmed by the authority of title 36 U.S.C. 176 (G). The gold fringe is a fourth color and represents "color of military law" jurisdiction, and when placed on the title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 Flag, mutilates the flag and suspends the Constitution. (Refer to title 18 U.S.C.242, see Black's Law Dictionary). As provided by title 36 U.S.C. 173 and Army Regulation 840-10, Chapter 2-1 (b). The flag of the United States of America is defined and described in title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2. Civilians must use the title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2, Flag ( see title 36 U.S.C. 173 and Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-7), and when military flags are displayed by Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2 and title 36 U.S.C. 175.”
The military statement can be seen at: www.vfwofwi.com
State document can be seen at: remnantofgod.org
The Confidential juror #64529 was then given by the Judge 5 day jail term threat of contempt of court charge for asking weather the juror was serve under military law or constitutional law?
The Judge refused to answer the question and has refused to answer the question to we the people, or the Confidential juror #64529. The question still stand, That if the juror dose not have the right to ask the courts questions about this remarkable and disgusting disclosure. Then what do the people have to get a fair trial or hearing? The following web sites are disclosed for your attention and opinion. If you have more questions and concern’s about this start your own inquest. Remember freedom is not free unless you stand up and start getting concerned. In Palmdale, Ca. Mayor removes all Gold fringe.
"The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any design of any nature." This is the old rules Long before the addition of gold fringe or Bush signing the flag with a marker as can be seen at www.ushistory.org
ALL NATIONS HAVE JUST ONE FLAG. ONE NATION, ONE LOYALTY.
www.apfn.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
It is my unprofessional understanding that under military law you are presumed guilty until proven innocent. I am not a attorney and can not give nor will I give legal help but I can give historical information as I see it. In constitutional law you are innocent until proven guilty. Wouldn’t that be a sham if you were found guilty and your rights were taken away with out recourse? Make no doubt about it.
So the next time you hear the pledge of allegiance to the flag ask yourself witch flag am I saying it to the one that suspends your rights? Or the one that garinties all your constitutional rights? now the government is not allowing flag recitation at falling vetern barials? next we will be traiding in combat boots for flip flops.

It all boils down to what Reagan did in 1988 bowing to pressure from the right: "Abolishing the Fairness Doctrine" which allowed channels like Fox News and Rush Limbaugh to exist. 92% of radio talk show hosts are right wing persuasion. Public airwaves belong to the public and the fairness doctrine must be restored. Insist that the presidential candidates promise to restore the fairness doctrine and bust the 5 media monopolies which control our thought process.

From the cable news ratings it is apparent that Fox is increasing its viewership by an average of 33,500 per day. New advertisers sign on at the rate of 17 per week. That does not include local broadcast Fox affiliates who are seeing their best advertising revenues ever.

Conclusion: this site is an ineffective attempt to control free speech and capitalism.

HASAN
What, you mean being correct? If you think calling DailyKos and MediaMatters Nazis and KKK is unbiased with no spin, just say so. And if you think that what i wrote is the equivalent of that, just say so. Your response is typical of the right — avoid the question. Just like the republicans with the moveon ad.

Typical response of left.

Right, HASAN. I forgot that in FOX's 'no spin zone', i'm exactly the same as the KKK and the nazis. That's totally accurate and unbiased.

You're welcome DJK. Just wanted everyone to see the spin in what you wrote. Most of your viewers only reply to the spin you throw out without reading an article or viewing a video. Even then caution must be used as this site distorts way more than Fox.

"I've been in homes of people who watch Fox and its usually people with recliners, shag wall to wall carpeting and think..."
I suppose your friends are watching a black and white TV and have empty beer cans all over too? You are such a low life scum bag...you're right it's all about you.

To me anyone who watches Faux News is usually uneducated, redneckish person. I've been in homes of people who watch Fox and its usually people with recliners, shag wall to wall carpeting and think the TV Guide crosswords are hard or have a hard time following "Murder She Wrote". The language they use appeal to these types of people. It's very simple language for simple minded people.
I've tried watching it, but its so condescending and simple that it made me sick to my stomach.

Thanks HASAN, for printing the article for all those who couldn't CLICK THE FUCKING LINK IN THE POST.

Besides, according to Bush and the republicans, it doesn't matter if what Hunt or MoveOn says is true or not. They said it's horrible to doubt the honor and integrity of military people. Period. It's idiotic, but it should at least be idiotic both ways, not just for republican douches. You prove nothing.

You heard the spin, now read the article:

Our generals are betraying our soldiers … again

Sorry, but I have to get your attention on this one. In both Afghanistan and Iraq, the United States Army — not the much maligned “LIBERAL PRESS” or BILL CLINTON or the LIBERALS IN CONGRESS — NO, the UNITED STATES MILITARY is prosecuting its soldiers for doing their jobs. I have tried, I have yelled, I have used nasty words. I have even tried to use humor, but none of this is sticking. You either do not believe me … or much worse, you do not care.

We did one of these stories on O’Reilly last week. Two great Special Forces soldiers, along with their team, tracked down a terrorist who was on the 10 Most Wanted list in Afghanistan. The Special Forces soldiers were operating under the much-hated rules of engagement, which said to capture or kill the bad guy, who was a bomb maker and terrorist leader. The soldiers followed this killer to his house/compound, used guile and trickery and lured the waste of life out of his lair and put a bullet in his head.

It was a perfect operation — a “Nice going guys,” high fives, take the day off, “Get ready for the next one,” type of operation. So how do you think our Special Forces soldiers were rewarded — or if not rewarded, treated — after this? THEY ARE BROUGHT TO TRIAL, INVESTIGATED AND FORCED TO SPEND THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FOR LAWYERS.

When the terrorist was first killed, the Army showed its trust in these bravest of the brave by investigating them twice. Both investigations, however unnecessary, found them innocent of any wrongdoing. So we now are so gun shy, so afraid and so massively politically correct, that we are treating combat like a police shooting. In most cities in this great country, if a police officer even shoots his weapon, he or she must face a board of inquiry. It makes the police officers crazy and causes all to look over their shoulders and to not trust their leaders -- but that is in a peaceful city, not a damn war zone.

Our generals in both the Army and Marine Corps have cared more about their precious careers and reputations than their soldiers and Marines under them. The Marines have actually prosecuted a Marine for shooting a terrorist too many times and the Army — well, the Army has the Pat Tillman tragedy, the Abu Graib disaster and many more to answer for, and now these courts martial.

In Iraq, the story is the same. The Army rediscovered a trick we used in ‘Nam' called “baiting,” where you leave ammunition and pieces of explosive devices out and shoot whoever takes them. We used to leave exploding ammo to put in your AK — when you try to fire it, the gun blows up. It worked then and it works now … but guess what the Army is now putting on trial: Ranger Snipers for doing their jobs. The rules of engagement were once again being followed and once again our generals put their careers over their men’s lives. The chilling effect that these actions have over our soldiers is dramatic; this distrust weakens the very foundations of our military. It causes soldiers to second-guess themselves and their chain of command. We cannot fight like this and hope to win.

We should be putting these generals on trial, first for going along with Rummy and just as important for not trusting their soldiers. At the very least, we should have a rule that states if you charge a soldier — like what happened in these cases — and they are cleared, YOU get charged and thrown in jail. Unfortunately, after the trials and after these soldiers’ careers and lives have been ruined and after they clear up the mountain of debt they will amass from these trials, the generals involved will get promoted.

These poor excuse for officers do not deserve the soldiers they dare claim they lead. We as a nation had better go out and find us another Marshall, who at the beginning of World War II fired hundreds of senior officers because they were not cutting it. We need him today, as many of our senior officers are way overdue for a one-way trip to the woodshed.