Haloween is not a liberal thing. Boy, how low can you go? It's a fun time for kids. This tradition has been going on since at least the 1950's if not earlier in the century. Haloween by term, means the day before the Hallowed All Saints Day (which in the Catholic faith is Nov. 1st). It is just fun for the kids to dress up and have a plain old good time. If you don't want to give candy, don't answer the door, simple as that!

I thought Stephen Colbert made this up. Now I see where he gets his ideas. Its getting harder and harder to distinguish between satirists and their subjects. This is what practicallt put the Firesign Theater out of business. How do you parody media that is already a parody of itself. Or as Colbert put it to O'Reilly, "If you're an act, then what am I!?" A great existentialist TV moment...

i didn't blame you i didn't blame you at all where did you get that from? im just saying don't say poor are poor because they don't work oh and there is such a thing as a condom ripping...soooo ya maybe its not their fault for having a kid and maybe they thought that abortion is evil i mean that is what you republicans preach all damn day and usually when your born poor you live poor because they have to work 3 times as hard as anyone else...without the resources to get into college because they cant fucking afford it

Give the ones working 2 or 3 jobs credit. They are getting by. Don't blame me for their situation. Maybe if they didn't have 5 children that they can't afford they would probably be in a different situation. Maybe if they got a better education they would of been doing a different job. Don't blame the government for their mistakes. Don't blame me that they are in the situation they are in now. Life is rough

OH Raziorizzo YOU BETTER SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT POOR PEOPLE ARE POOR BECASUE THEY DONT WORK. Single mothers that work 3 jobs to provide for their children, parents that work 2 minimum wage jobs each 2 provide MOST JOBS DONT PAY WELL! if you work 10 hours a day 7 days a week without missing one day that = 19,656$ ok - taxes, - home, - food, - health those are the people on welfare OR THEY WERE SERIOUSLY HURT AND CANT!i would REALLY like 2 know where you got that statistic saying most ppl on it sit at home drinking beer you son of a bitch and even people you republicans so say "support" only make 16,000$ a year! ya the fucking army. I know so many people that bust their ass every fucking day and still dont make enough 2 get buy and thats when they have 2 decide to either have heat or food you prick i cant believe you actully just said what you said DONT TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU DONT KNOW!

Do I care about poor people? Most of them , if they had any motivation wouldn't be poor. Most people who live on welfare are healthy and able to work. Some decide to stay home drink beer and do nothing all day. Feel bad for them? Maybe if they showed or even made some effort to better themselves they wouldn't be in that situation. I worked in a construction company in NY were they had guys working 70,80 and even 90 hours A WEEK to support their families and put food on the table. They didn't expect a handout. They worked. In your world we should all hold hands and sing Koombaya. Its a rough world out there buddy and no one is looking out for you. You want to get somewhere you got to earn it. How do you think I got whee I am?? I busted my ass and sacraficed A LOT for what I got. Feel bad for freeloaders who go through life expecting a handout? Never.

You cannot attack another country based on "what ifs" and "supposition" and "speculation" as to what they might do. Especially the United States, we have no credibility left in the world.

What if a paranoid China thought the US was going to "accidently" give nukes to Tibet or Taiwan? What is a paranoid "Russia" though we were going to give nukes to Poland?

John,

I don't think the problem with Iran is that it would attack the United States as a nation. I don't think any country would do that. The problem is that once they have created nuclear bombs these could be stolen or "accidentally given" to terrorists which would detonate them in the United States. If this happened, we would not know who to blame.

Democrats, "Do as I say, not as I do."

OH SNAP! SORRY YO I HAD 2 COME BACK 2 SEE WHAT SOME OF YALL WOULD SAY 2 WHAT I SAID jajajaja i gota say that john kid know his shit jaja but yo whats wrong with loving a gun of 2 here and there they fun here what yall need 2 do john raziorizzo brennan hooah get da fuck of your comp and go do sumthin

Raz - Why do you on the radical right think it's ok for the US to spend 600 billion dollars in Iraq and be among the worst industrialized nations in the world in infant mortality?

Raz - Why do you on the radical right scream so loudly about not aborting a mass of undefined cells - yet you don't care about our infant mortality rate or that our poor children don't get adequate health care?

Are we spending 600 billion dollars because we are afraid that the Suni's and Shiites are rowing furiously across the ocean in rowboats to attack us? Is that your answer?

Do you not realized that you on the right are not very nice or decent people? That you seem to love war and guns and violence. That you don't care much for the poor or minorities. Don't you realize that discussion, collaboration, negotiation and diplomacy solve differences not violence?

Perhaps you will do some soul searching and maybe just a little humanity will peek out from the recesses of your dark soul. I'm rooting for 'ya.

no it was the a senator...i do appoligize i forgot what one but here is something worst Rumsfeld said this "Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that" so suck on the Raz oh haha he also said this "The idea that it's going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990," OH AND HERE IS JUST ONE MORE THING HAHA "U.S. military at present is capable to do the job and finish it fast"

IT looks like republicans talk first think later oh and that noneya guy first off work on grammar before you criticize someone for being a "loser" dumbass

No Iran is not a threat to the United States, anymore than Iraq was. The United States must shed this notion that we have the right to decide how other countries choose to live. Iran cannot and will never attack the United States; that is preposterous as the know they will cease to exist fifteen minutes later. We do not have the moral authority to tell the world what to do or to impose our will using force. It is immoral and it is wrong; as is war based on speculation and what ifs.

No one appointed us the world's policeman and international adventures should be restricted to humanitarian ones that take place with the world's cooperation. To do otherwise makes us all less safe and relegates us to a less than respected position in others eyes.

The United States foreign policy is why we are in any danger at all of being attacked by anyone. We are arrogant, narcissistic and base our policies on what makes corporations wealthy and dictators who oppress their people powerful.

Who said the troops would be home befor Christmas '04? If you say President Bush or his administration you are a liar. As far as Iraq being a threat to its neighbor maybe you forgot the war it started with Iran that lasted how many years? Or maybe it slipped your mind that when they invaded Kuwait? Or maybe you forgot about the 14 UN resolutions that they did not abide by. Or maybe it was Saddams refusal to allow weapons inspectors in his country. And when he did allow them he would only bring them to predesignated sites.
You say : War is wrong in almost all cases and is justifiable only when a country is attacked or a neighbor is threatened, etc.
Do you believe Iran is a threat? Is it justified if we go to war with them? Or is it justified when a neighbor is threatened? That is justifiable reason to go to war? Do you realize we get threatened everyday. Do we go to war with these countries? I know I know I'm stupid I don't know what I'm talking about. Let me guess. That's not what you meant right? And which survey did you take that 75% of Americans feel that way? really? 75% huh. Interesting. I am willing to make a bet come January the Democrats will change their tune once again on Iraq. They already went from "The war is lost" , to "I'll pull the troops out immediately" to "Pull the troops with 1 year" to "Pull the troops by 2012" to " Can't make a commitment on pulling the troops" to "Even though there is progress the war is out of control" to "There is some progree seen in some areas." Hmmmmmmmmm wonder what their next stance is. You noticed they have backed away from talking about Iraq. AND WHERE IS HOWARD DEAN AND JOHN KERRY???

You know I commentted to you people when you first sent me this site. I am upset about the sex crap they (Fox) is using, but Iam concerned about ALL big media. They are all full of untruths and spinning issues to suit their own aggendas. I would still love to rub Hannity face in dog poop, but there are others who are out of control as well and filling their listeners full of crap. CNN is notorius for this. Don't you agree? If you don't then you can take this web site and shove it up your ass as well.

Raz you just don't get it. War is wrong in almost all cases and is justifiable only when a country is attacked or a neighbor is threatened, etc. Wars that are unecessary and based on lies are never justifiable. That's not what this country should be about.

Almost 75% of the American people feel this way and about the same percentage world wide. You are part of a very small minority at this point.

actully Raziorizzo we were told that we would b out before Christmas 2004 and that the war would pay for itself with the oil that we found there... so lol maybe you should like shut the fuck up lol oh and haha talk first think later is better then attack first think later

And hoohaha, who said the Iraq war was going to be quick? Do you think before you talk or just like a liberal democrat talk first and think later.

Maybe you would know more if you do research before you talk.
This is from Council on Foreign Affairs:
Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship provided headquarters, operating bases, training camps, and other support to terrorist groups fighting the governments of neighboring Turkey and Iran, as well as to hard-line Palestinian groups. During the 1991 Gulf War, Saddam commissioned several failed terrorist attacks on U.S. facilities. Prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the State Department listed Iraq as a state sponsor of terrorism. The question of Iraq’s link to terrorism grew more urgent with Saddam’s suspected determination to develop weapons of mass destruction.
Saddam has aided the Iranian dissident group Mujahedeen-e-Khalq and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (known by its Turkish initials, PKK), a separatist group fighting the Turkish government. Moreover, Iraq has hosted several Palestinian splinter groups that oppose peace with Israel , including the mercenary Abu Nidal Organization, whose leader, Abu Nidal, was found dead in Baghdad in August 2002. Iraq has also supported the Islamist Hamas movement and reportedly channeled money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. A secular dictator, however, Saddam tended to support secular terrorist groups rather than Islamist ones such as al-Qaeda, experts say.
And also...............In the 1980s Iran-Iraq War, Iraqi troops repeatedly used poison gas, including mustard gas and the nerve agent sarin, against Iranian soldiers. Iranian officials have also accused Iraq of dropping mustard-gas bombs on Iranian villages. Human Rights Watch reports that Iraq frequently used nerve agents and mustard gas against Iraqi Kurds living in the country’s north. In March 1988, Saddam’s forces reportedly killed thousands of Iraqi Kurds in the town of Halabja with chemical weapons.

Oh wait...It wan't Al-Queda. No maybe it wasn't Al-Quada. Were they the good terrorist? Has Al-Qaeda become a brand name for terrorist? If it's not Al-Qaeda then we should leave them alone?

ya i actully have to say....i agree with Grayson this rating system is really gay but Grayson none of Raz's comments was removed

So what is the deal with this rating system? I've seen all conservative comments marked with many negatives and the liberal statements with positives. One of Raz's comments had more than 3 negatives and was removed. So this is basically a way to silence anyone with a non ultra left wing liberal viewpoint? Ha, I love liberals and their warped idea of free speech.

Democrats, "Do as I say, not as I do."

end of story haha ok just to make it clear no Iraq did not support terrorist you idiot...oh and quick attack on Iraq you mean like that " quick " attack on Iraq haha ya thats gona work spread our troops into 3 counties and then what lol then it would be Pakistan then Syria then the whole Mideast? oh except for Saudi Arabia because haha even though they have the most terrorist....they give us oil

Iraq did not support terrorists who attacked this country, they had nothing whatsoever to do with Al Qaeda or any other group that threatened the United States.

Do you realize how stupid that sounds??? Iraq had no terrorist?? we created them?? Anyway , No one said Saddam was ever connected to 9/11. He had nothing to do with 9/11. He supported terrorist. He financed terrorist. He was a threat and we moved to end the threat. End of story. He is no longer a threat. Next target .......IRAN. Everything is almost set in place for a quick attack. No doubt. We are going in. Targets have been established. It's only a matter of time.

hooah
Assrazzio is a fear filled coward who is scared of what Faux tells him to be scared of.
Iraq was not a threat in the real world.
In the fantasy world of Faux, Saddam was behind 9-11, the hijackers were from Iraq and the WMD were moved to Syria.

Repugs-No new ideas-Nothing but Fear

no..lol because Afghanistan actually had terrorist in it like the taliban and was hiding Al queda and no WWII did not have coverage like that Iraq had no Terrorist when we invaded we created Terrorist when we invaded you stupid people and ok Saddam is out of power NOW WHAT now Iran sees its chance IRAQ AND IRAN kept themselves from getting 2 powerful no iran is getting nuclear power and getting a bigger army and stop saying that crap about Saddam YES HE WAS A BAD GUY! we all know that no one is saying he wasnt BUT THERE ARE BAD PEOPLE WAYYYY WORSE THEN THAT ALL OVER THE FUCKING WORLD its not our responsibility to stop all of them AND if it was why would we go after Saddam? he posed NO threat to us what so ever and Africa millions of more people are being massacred and Saudi Arabia is where Osama is from and the people where who committed those acts on 9/11 are from and hell Pakistan hides Al queda and hezbollah why not them

Hmmmmmmmmm Lemme see No point to the Iraq war huh? Uday and Kusay are dead, Saddam is out of power, Iraq now poses no threat to the US, thousands of terrorist killed, 25 million people liberated from the rape room ,torture rooms, hundreds of thousand of bodies in mass graves found, Libya gave up its weapons, eh no point. Now...You said CNN doesn't complain about Afghanistan. Why not?? Oh that's right you said it had a point. Did Afghanistan attack us? But thats different right. They have terrorist in Syria , Iran , Saudi Arabia , Afghanistan but not in Iraq. Was that it? If WWII had the same coverage as it did today you moronic left wing liberals will be pulling the same shit as you do today, " WE GOTTA GET OUT!!" "WE CAN'T WIN" The democrats are headed for a landfall defeat. The congress is in shambles, theylost control, President Bush is still in command. Mukasey was appointed AG even though the democrats vowed not to confirm him .You guys are like running around in circles angry about everything. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!! It is funny

Nazis and Islamists
By Paul Belien
November 7, 2007
During the Second World War, the Nazis worked on plans to build the "Amerikabomber," an airplane specially devised to fly suicide missions into Manhattan's skyscrapers.

Albert Speer, the Nazi minister for armaments, recalled in his diary: "It was almost as if [Hitler] was in a delirium when he described to us how New York would go up in flames. He imagined how the skyscrapers would turn into huge blazing torches. How they would crumble while the reflection of the flames would light the skyline against the dark sky." Hitler hated Manhattan. It was, he said, "the center of world Jewry." Less than 60 years later, Hitler's plans were executed by Muslim immigrants living in Germany. At the 2003 trial of the network around Mohamed Atta (the pilot who flew into the World Trade Center), Shahid Nickels, a German convert to Islam and a friend of Atta's, said that the Islamists had targeted Manhattan because it is "the center of world Jewry, and the world of finance and commerce controlled by it."

The parallels between Nazism and Islamism are overwhelming. Yet the subject is a taboo. When last March the German historian Matthias Kuentzel, author of "Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the Roots of 9/11," was to give a lecture at the University of Leeds (Britain), the university authorities cancelled the lecture after threats from Muslim students.

There is a war going on between the Jihadists and the West. We are losing the battle because, as so often in man's history, our political leaders think that they are still fighting the previous war. Europeans who warn against the danger of Islamism are considered — and sometimes even prosecuted — as xenophobes, racists, even neo-Nazis...

Washington Post

oh and yes radical liberals existed back before WWII i mean did you really just say that? look at the fucking revolution a far left war...you conservatives were the loyalist dedicated to England :)

are you both out of your fucking minds? because cnn wasn't around, thats such bullshit i mean cnn does not complain about Afghanistan BECASUE IT HAS A POINT TO IT! they wouldn't complain about WWII because it had a point to it! they complain about Iraq because it has no point to it!

We did not hear liberals complain?? Thats cause CNN wasn't around. What would they of said when 2,000 , 3,000 troops died......IN ONE DAY Can you IMAGINE We would all be speaking German today. The fact of the matter is the good news on Iraq gets either buried in the paper or not mentioned at all

"you didn't hear any liberals complain about WWII"

There were no liberals back then; Democrats were still patriots but that ended shortly after JFK, who would not recognize the so-called progressives of today.

what lol thats not the point at all the point is that it is a pointless war where innocent people and our soldiers are dieing...you didn't hear any liberals complain about WWII did you no it was a just war and the thing you have to learn about Vietnam that if the people have a will of Freedom they are not going to surrender there are going to be car bombs and suicide bombers people that jump out of a building holding a 6 year old and yes the fucking pussy's do that just like the Vietcong its not going to stop

Vietnam was lost by people like you. It wasn't lost militarily. The democrats tried to do the same thing with Iraq. Thank God President Bush stood his ground and said we will win this war. To bad the good news o Iraq was buried in the NY Times yesterday on page A-19, headline from the New York Times: "Militant Group Is Out of Baghdad," US Says. "American forces have routed Al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia, the Iraqi militant network, from every neighborhood of Baghdad, a top American general said today, allowing American troops involved in the 'surge' to depart as planned.
Then of course there is this story which you will never hear on News networks:
"'First Sunni-Shia 'Fatwa Against Violence' to Be Signed in Iraq.' Senior religious leaders in Iraq are preparing to sign an unprecedented 'fatwa against violence' that will help reconcile the rival Sunni and Shia branches of Islam and herald new hopes for peace in the war-torn country." Violence is down, reconciliation is up. "'There is not a quick, easy solution,' he continued. 'This is long-term work. We have to engage with these people continually. The key thing is talking to them every day. Never before has there been a Sunni-Shia fatwa against violence. It has never been heard of in history. Will it make a difference? Not immediately. But I hope eventually it will.'"
New York Post page 20:
Officials Cite Return Of Iraqis to Baghdad As Violence Declines." Forty-six thousand returned to Baghdad last month.
Forty-six thousand and thirty of them, actually, returned last month from outside the country to their homes in the capital. Guess thats not big news
Its funny to hear liberal democrats still crying the war is out of control. And Harry Reid yelling "THE WAR IS LOST!"
That was how Veitnam was lost

actully it think its the opposite reapwys i think Ehrenfeld is more of a American then you. A true American questions the administration, a true American raises points, a true American makes people think. I mean look at the fucking revolution people started to ask questions and think hell if it was up to you people we would still be England and look at Vietnam when Nixon lied to us about the death tolls for US and innocent civilians but A LOT the N.Y. times looked into and found out it was bullshit. A true American does not just sit back and do nothing

It's no longer your country you coward Ehrenfeld. You divorced yourself from America a long time ago.

I am ashamed and embarrassed about what my country has become. We throw people in a prison camp indefinately with no right to a trial and torture some of them? That is what Nazi's and Communists do; that's not what America should do. Where is the proof they are terrorists? You expect us to believe this administration? The biggest liars that have ever been in power? The WMD neo-cons? No one believes a word they say except a handful of reactionary kool-aid drinkers.

Raz that is such bullshit if that was true they would be tried and would be POW and their have been over 20 people found innocent...but not after being tortured OH SORRY " enhanced interrogation" i have no problem fucking up a terrorist but the problem is THEY ARE NOT ALL TERRORISTS!!!

Gitmo?!?! What happened at Gitmo? I gotta hear this!!! They are being treated better than when they were in their caves. And the ones who were released were captured a short time later trying to kill our troops. And if a terrorist prisoner gets beat once in a while so be it

what me...im not talking about US soldiers im talking about the prisoners at gitmo not one has actully been tried in a court system yet

Get your facts straight dope :
Specialist Charles Graner guilty was found guilty of prisoner abuse. Four soldiers have pleaded guilty and been sentenced over the Abu Ghraib scandal. Staff Sergeant Ivan Frederick, has been sentenced to eight years in prison and a dishonourable discharge.
Others were given lesser sentences.
Janis Karpinski, the commander of the miscreants who had perpetrated the Abu Ghraib fiasco, was being demoted from brigadier general to colonel for "seriously lacking" performance,and lets not forget Lynndie England who on 26 September 2005 she was convicted by a military jury on six counts in connection with the prisoner abuse, including one count of conspiracy, and sentenced to three years in prison.
Why do you always put your foot in your mouth?

im glad 2 know torturing innocent people makes you laugh

You crack me up.

ya...but not one NOT ONE! has been found guilty so wtf? and what about those 2 guys that turned out to be 100% innocent and went there for like there brothers marriage or something like that and what about that German guy that was picked up tortured and turns out HUH! he was innocent what did they do they dumped him out on the street so dont give us that all of them are terrorist BULLSHIT

First of all :
The Geneva Convention ("Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War") covers members of the armed forces who fall into enemy hands. They are in the power of the enemy State, not of the individuals or troops who have captured them

Prisoners of war MUST be:

- Treated humanely with respect for their persons and their honour.
- Enabled to inform their next of kin and the Central Prisoners of War Agency (ICRC, the International Red Cross) of their capture.
- Allowed to correspond regularly with relatives and to receive relief parcels.
- Allowed to keep their clothes, feeding utensils and personal effects.
- Supplied with adequate food and clothing.
- Provided with quarters not inferior to those of their captor's troops.
- Given the medical care their state of health demands.
- Paid for any work they do.
- Repatriated if certified seriously ill or wounded, (but they must not resume active military duties afterwards) .
- Quickly released and repatriated when hostilities cease.

It does not apply to terrorist, yet Americans treat them as POWs and don't bring up Abu Gahrib those soldiers were prosecuted and convicted. They are being treated better than they should have. We are not talking about car theives here guys. These are guys who would kill an American soldier given a chance. I don't hear anyone crying Geneva Convention when a US troop gets captured and their body dragged across town. Saddam Hussein did not abide by the UN Resolutions to disarm and he payed the price. The UN has been a joke. It should be dismantled and sold as Condo apartments in NYC. How many from the UN made millions from the Oil for food scandal. As for the violence in Iraq decreasing ,US Troops will leave when Iraq troops step up. Which is what they are doing. They have control of 8 out of the 14 provinces so far. And maybe you missed the "Impeach Cheney" talk in the house bought by democrats. The Republicans called them on it and took a vote. The democrats were stunned when Republicans started to vote YES!! The democrats then backed down. All talk and no action democrats. They talk the talk but when they get called on it...they go out with a wimper. Guess if you didn't watch Fox News you missed it. No wonder you guys want Fox to go away

well the point Raz is were not talking were not talking to anyone. But when we do talk IT WORKS! and if it doesn't then war should be considered but it should be the last action it should always be the last action and again stop with the hoohaha its a little childish don't you think

Raz, so you’re for talking problems out or against talking? I'm confused help me understand you!!
"The left is doing the best they can to not admit the surge is working."

Yes the surge is reducing violence, but what does that mean exactly? Those extra troops being used for the surge are going home soon, do you think without the extra patrols and crackdowns violence will continue to decline? Violence will only breed violence, you must solve this diplomatically.

I’m pretty sure John was saying apologize to the world because the US foreign policy is making the world more dangerous, without global support in dealing with the supposed terrorist threats America will slowly bleed to death. There’s reasons other countries have pulled there troops out, they’re smart enough to realize this macho man cowboy style of approaching this specific situation is not working. Bushes ignorance of the Geneva Convention and sidestepping of the UN has pissed off most of the world hence we must apologize. How that shows weakness is beyond me, I mean I know it’s a good right wing attack point but it’s a little childish isn’t it? Don’t you think using cunning and wisdom to “defeat” your enemy makes more sense rather than emboldening them by killing their fathers, brothers, mothers, sisters, uncles, cousins, and friends? Brute force will not “defeat” this enemy, that culture has stood up to hundreds of years of attacks both external and internal what makes you think we’ll break that cycle?

Hoohaha ......... The terrorist have almost stopped bombing in Iraq. Talking does work. Now get to school it's geting late

wow Raziorizzo haha your a dick just making a nice point on wondering how you get from Halloween and Hanity to Iraq and you say that he has ADD and should seek therapy oh and just to let you know talking does work just look at N Korea or Ireland and N Ireland...and a million other places i just named those 2 cause their happening now Korea has stopped with trying to obtain Nuclear power and the terrrosit bombing has stopped between Ireland because their what? TALKING!...you bastard now you got me off topic

Is it to hard for you to follow? Maybe if you read slower you can follow the converstion. Have you been checked for A.D.D? It's okay , therapy helps. Try to concentrate.