Problem with Obama he won't win one red state with his extreme left plans and viewpoints.

McCain due to him being a moderate and a maverick will surely give Obama a run for his money in some Blue states. NY Times tried hard to slander McCain and it back fires gotta love it... talk to the average Joe they think McCain is a war hero and a good man... Obama just talks and talks and talks with no real plan... but he does sound good though... Give him that... But no substance... he keeps giving to same speech over and over starting to get stale. What I want is WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO OBAMA and HOW ARE YOU GOING TO PAY FOR IT!! Obama says "Yes we can!!" Yes we can what??????? What are you going to do and again Obama how are you going to pay for it?????

Here is the report on BIll O'Rielly:

http://upsidedownstamps.com

I believe that united states is a free country that you can exercise your own right, but at the some time Fox news broadcust should be cauncil from the earth.

Bubba

Does O'Reilly actually have Cancer? That sort of news would make my day. I hope he dies a very slow, painful, miserable death that costs his children a ton of money. Then I hope the same for his children.

Bill O'Reilly is no kind of man. He is a cowardly little pencil-neck geek. Smartass. I'd love to see someone pound him to death on live TV. Has anyone ever seen him interview someone who might just stomp him to death for his arrogance? The ugliest, most discusting thing in the world is arrogance. Arrogance is not possible where not accompanied by stupidity. I would pay big money for a chance to knock that smug cancer right off his face.

No thanx Paul:

No Dems need any medicines. Especially, since now that the FDA and the NIH, as well as the CDC, are all answerring to homeland security and fake third party testing companies, set up during the Bush administration, the drug supply of our own medicine is very likely tainted.

No thanx Paul:

No Dems need any medicines. Especially, since now that the FDA and the NIH, as well as the CDC, are all answerring to homeland security and fake third party testing companies, set up during the Bush administration, the drug supply of our own medicine is very likely tainted.

Another American:

Yup, yup, yup, and wee! You would have to pay me a lot of money to go on a program with a moron like that. And a lot more money not to beat his ass severely by the time security drags me off of his lifeless broken body.

He works for Australian business interests over American interests, so no need to say more about the freaken traiter.

I would buy everyone a round of beer at the bar if I heard somebody found where his children are and gave him something to remember them by. Like one of their heads on a stick.

Honestly, these guys on fox are like a train wreck, I can’t take my eyes off 'em, though everything they do and say is reprehensible. The worst part is they are such psychotics (definition: individuals who are out of touch with reality) that they will not stop their forum of "hate for everyone" until everyone, weather for or against them just hates someone or something. Even if we hate them, they are okay with that too. "Just Hate someone pleeeeassse." It’s great, it’s like if I’m pissed at anyone, I just turn on fox and relief comes when I hear that moron say, "Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!" and "Cut their mic, now" to the guests he brings on his show. Humm I wonder why rational men don’t want to appear on the “NETWORK FOR PHYCHOTICS”.

I think that they would rather just get the free publicity from the name recognition advertisement given them on Fox for free.

You must like Australian politics, but yelling "Shut-up!" at people is about as non-useful as interviews can get.

This is a joke! The reason they won't appear on Fox is that they are afraid to be confonted on the issues, plain and simple! This year is the first time ever a democrat candidate refuses to be on "ALL" the networks! You know it, I know it, and guess what? "All" americans know it! This is why 22% of the Democrats have left their party.

.

Simple one again: Reine is too slow and uneducated to realize that it matters very little whether Fox is saying Clinton or O'Bama, they still benefit by having a single party system(demopublichen wing and demopublichen wing). These foriegnors have a monopoly on our airwaves.

That should be enough to want to vote the two party system out before it becomes more of a tool for us to be exploited further from our rights to our democracy. Fuck what unkle skum likes about anything.

I assume you will have more choices than those lousey sell-out liars. If you prefer to twist a democracy into a ball of BS go right ahead.
Although, I thought that was our treasonous government's job to do that.

It is really very simple, you have to count all of the votes before it is a democracy. If you refuse to count the votes, then expect that you will not live in a democracy. If you call republicans the only party in the system, then I will agree, but the other wing of the same party is called the democrats. Neither will honor their constuents votes, rather the handful of foriegn and domestic campaign contributors.

...

To Robert:
Good Luck with your lawsuit.
Anyway , we will have a choice or candidates to choose from. It will be Hillary Clinton. or maybe Barrack Obama from the Democrat side.
And either Mitt Romney , Huckabee or Maccain. Outside chance of Giuliani. Those are going to be your choices.
We don't live in a land where majority rules. Or mob rules. We are living in a Republic. A Republic is representative government ruled by law (the Constitution). A Republic recognizes the inalienable rights of individuals .
Article IV Section 4, of the Constitution "guarantees to every state in this union a Republican form of government".... Conversely, the word Democracy is not mentioned even once in the Constitution. Madison warned us of the dangers of democracies with these words,

"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths...",
"We may define a republic to be ... a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior. It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of republic." James Madison, Federalist No. 10, (1787)

Tony Jay:

I have filed lawsuits by myself to make some of this happen. It is expensive and they are immune to prosecution. Please let me know which of your lousey pack of dullard dogs has invested one freaken dime of their time or money. None. Likley you sit on a lazy government job and murmer this shallow tripe as if that is doing something.

Unless of course you had plans to make the country ungovernable by burning it to the ground, soliciting aleggiance from Americans on the ground. And retaking it over. Shy of that, you will have to vote someone in who does not need Unkle swine to survive. You don't have the guts to do it even if they did count the votes. You and the rest of the nation cannot imagine a world in which you don't let the media and some government trash from your Universities convince you that you don't need your rights.

Nice try Jay, but a poor excuse for a waste of time trying to get the District Attorneys to prosecute their fellow alumni accross town that also steals your tax dollars. We have two-thirds of the world's lawyers right here in the USA. 2/3rds of all law suits are corporations sueing other corporations, and you cannot even get your medical bills paid if they exceed what the insurance companies want to pay.

And after reading all of that simple tripe you cited, let me guess, you still want gun control.

Because if you don't your job and certainly your glass ceitling will be limited. Grow some nads and follow the money trail to the government officials lacking in their jobs taking the money.

Then tell me the story of how we can digress to argue about that tripe that you have not gotten past yourself.

Join against the government skum when you sit on a jury of peers against your fellow peasants. Any government officials on trial need to be found guilty of anything, and swift, classical punishment can be taken. where will you find a prosecutor. The legal system is totally flawed and without civilized recourse for this nation.
Ben Franklin and Jefferson were correct. You are now too late to correct your ignorant desire to have TV trailer trash tell you who the good guys are. those skanks on TV had to couch cast for a job. Even when they were in college, they knew that was the case.

In reply to Robert Kunferman, Mr. Kunferman you are correct in you assessment, but WE all can solve that problem by holding them accountable. In order to do that WE have to take responsibility ourselves. Please read my previous post and do your own research in the topics of that post. I have noticed that many of the individuals on this blog spend too much time helping the powers that be by arguing amongst themselves. Lets use that energy against them and take back our REPUBLIC. Those of us on this blog can do something to change this country by taking responsibility for our country ourselves instead of depending on elected officials who, through our own ignorance of the actual laws that the government abides by, do nothing we for us. Lets quit fighting. In order to change this country we must have our state legislatures pressure Congress to reverse the Treasonous acts that past sessions of Congress ratified. These are listed in my previous post. Secondly, we have to inform organizations like this one, MoveOn.org, the ACLU and other citizen groups on the Internet to force the Candidates in open debate on TREASON. We should not vote for Obama, Clinton or any candidate that will not abolish the Act of 1871, the Federal Reserve Act and others that I have listed in my previous post. Incidentally, both Obama and Clinton have been asked about the Income Tax issue and BOTH have refused to publicly or privately comment on such, because they both know that the law supporting it doesn't exists. It is our fault has a nation for not forcing them to change it. We need to accountable ourselves before we hold them accountable. We can do this if we call it for what it is, TREASON. All the candidates have people that scour the Internet looking at political blogs like this one. If their spin doctors see that their candidates will viewed by the public at large has the TRAITORS they are for not being the elected officials of the REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and not the Corporation of the USA, then they have only two options; change their stance on what they should be doing, or continue and make attempts to defend their political integrity. If they choose the second course, and defend these treasonous acts that have taken the power away from the citizens of the REPUBLIC, then if they walk and talk like one, then they are TRATIOR to the REPUBLIC. I'll leave you with the following to consider; Ron Paul is the only candidate that has spent his entire political career trying to abolish some of these key problems that have faced this country. Even if you personally don't agree with his politics, why would or should be vote for ANY candidate who won't return abolish these previous acts of TREASON. Please research the information I've listed in my previous post for yourself. If WE all take this information to our local media agencies, our local and state governments, we could bring about a change for the better. We have to be well informed first, and take full responsibility for our country.

I know this may be off topic, and many of you may not know of me, but recently I have learned that because of the Act of 1871, Our country is a corporation, with the District of Columbia its seat of power. The Federal Law used by the corporation of the USA is that of International Maritime/Admiralty Law. This is important because, the president,and congress are only Not beholden to the citizens of the REPUBLIC of the United States. The REPUBLIC IS THE LAW OF THE LAND (The 50 states themselves), not Federal Law, now I still don't know all the details, but if there are those of you that do, please post and let me know.
Also the original 13th article to the amendment to the Constitution (Ratified in 1810 and not longer printed with current copies of the Constitution) also gives the corporate government their power over us. I had been discussing this with Rane56, before here. Both political parties, are in on this, and by both I mean senior member of the parties and of course the White House. The District of Columbia has its own constitution, whcih is again an act of TREASON that was given to it by the Act of 1871. We all need to come together and have our state legislatures ENFORCE the "Law of the Land", that of the REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES, and not that of the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES. Incidentally, Law of Admiralty/International Maritime Law, really is only SUPPOSED to apply to the District of Columbia. But due to US ALL practicing the Treasonous Act of IGNORANCE OF THE LAW, the government has been laughing at us. It is not my intention to offend anyone posting here and I include myself in this. The veil of ignorance has been lifted now on this matter. Do you own research on this. The Act of 1871, the Federal Reserve Act, the Original 13th Article of Amendment to the Constitution, the complete 14th Amendment, and most definitely the removal of the electoral college. We could vote for the which ever candidate we want, but until that institution is removed, NO president will be elected in this REPUBLIC by popular vote.

I know this may be off topic, and many of you may not know of me, but recently I have learned that because of the Act of 1871, Our country is a corporation, with the District of Columbia its seat of power. The Federal Law used by the corporation of the USA is that of International Maritime/Admiralty Law. This is important because, the president,and congress are only Not beholden to the citizens of the REPUBLIC of the United States. The REPUBLIC IS THE LAW OF THE LAND (The 50 states themselves), not Federal Law, now I still don't know all the details, but if there are those of you that do, please post and let me know.
Also the original 13th article to the amendment to the Constitution (Ratified in 1810 and not longer printed with current copies of the Constitution) also gives the corporate government their power over us. I had been discussing this with Rane56, before here. Both political parties, are in on this, and by both I mean senior member of the parties and of course the White House. The District of Columbia has its own constitution, whcih is again an act of TREASON that was given to it by the Act of 1871. We all need to come together and have our state legislatures ENFORCE the "Law of the Land", that of the REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES, and not that of the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES. Incidentally, Law of Admiralty/International Maritime Law, really is only SUPPOSED to apply to the District of Columbia. But due to US ALL

I wanted to share these links to a new political satire web video series. "Itty Bitty Liddy" follows the 2008 election with a film noir take on the fitional exploits of G. Gordon Liddy, as he attempts to take down the democratic pool of candidates one by one. Absurdist, topical and episodic.

http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=261

http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=318

http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=356

Thanks for your consideration.

Big Fat Brain

Raz:

Michelle cannot give you an example of racism, because her school has defined it as "any white male over the age of forty that can think for themselves, and who doesn't need a government friend to give him a do nothing job in the government sector". This misinterpretation of the world by Michelle is just like it has been falsely defined by an entire two generation of school teachers and University Professors before this brown nosing imp came along.

Read a little history Michelle. Start with the Jacksonian era, where Andy Jack did just the same tripe as the BS repube-lichens did some 180 years ago. The funny thing about all of this is that the swiney dirty Dems got fooled by Shrub this time around, and Shrub and company were using the same bits that the Jacksonian (Early organized Dems) were doing.

On the web, she could be a boy instead of a girl. So, maybe we should leave him alone to ponder her gender issues.

Michelle, Sharpton and Jackson have done NOTHING besides cause racism. Rape hoaxes, riots, and rap music. By the way, where are all the protests against the rappers who call women bitches and hos?

Wow- the guy that called Obama "a domestic insurgent" can't be serious. In the world we live in (post 911) has to be slanderous. Seriously, I am afraid what will happen once he is President. The firestorm will be swift. And I hope the Secret Service has their training together...

Michelle, Can you give me just one example of Bill O'Reillys blatant racism. I know you are going to say ,"There are so many examples!!!" Just listen to him!!!" I am not asking for so many examples. I am just asking for 1.

Yeah, I think loudmouths and con artists like Jackson and Sharpton do so much for the black population. Give it up, Rocky. You're full of shit and you have nothing to say except right-wing talking points that you copy from that pill-popping degenerate Rush Fatso.

Don't take that condescending tone with me, little boy. Just because you can't find your penis with a magnifying glass doesn't mean you have to treat all women like morons. So cut the bullshit, asshole.

Michelle has friends in the pseudo-education system.

Suffice to say that her level of thought rises to: Racism is ickey. All of the inconsistencies and unfairness within the education system is just a mistake.

She only sees repube-lichen racism, because her grades will suffer if she sees the Demopubelacrat's systemic racism that causes much more harm than Reillies news cast.

Michelle, it's liberals like you who are racist. You call blacks "Uncle Toms" and "sellouts" for not supporting Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. You demanded that Imus be fired, but won't go after vulgar rappers. You supported the rape hoaxes by Crystal Mangum and Tawana Brawley.

Wow! Are you a Gnostic?

O'Reilly's a blatant racist, as are most of the right-wing in this country. The fact that a black person and a woman are on the political stage at the same time makes them want to vomit, I'm sure.

i think bill o' reily is a racist and all members of fox news. o'reily is indirectly campaigning for Hilary Clinton by bring obama down. i'm british and lives in england, foxnews is always baised when it comes to abama issues. if a staff of obama block camera recording, o'reily should know that, that place is a campaign ground, nobody care about the media. i'm ashame to see you talking about it everytime, shits happens. Obama deserves a chance, allow him to change america.

Michelle, Margaret Sanger didn't hide her hatred of Jews and blacks. She was a proud supporter of eugenics.

Margaret Sanger is one of my heroines, so I know a lot about her. The myths about her being a racist were spread by anti-choice nutbags like you. I still stand by my statement that you shouldn't procreate.

Michelle, if you knew the truth about Planned Parenthood and its founder Margaret Sanger, you would vomit.

So many of you are hypocrites and ignorant junkies. Of course you can cut and splice film together to make fox news look bad but the fact is, you had to cut and splice the film clips together...
I agree that fox news has "bias" anchors; however, its America and they have just as much right to vomit out their opinions as many of you so often do.
Many of you are so convinced that you are right. How can you be right when you are unable to explore the other side without emotional bias?
My point is, just because you think you are right doesnt mean that you are. I think The only reason people hate fox news is because it challenges peoples opinions and that scares them.
Anyone who wants to "shut down" fox news is a threat to the freedom America exists and fights for.
If you really want to "fight" fox news in a free-world way, make your own news program and we will see if it is as popular.

Haha. I love that Rocky Retard thinks being "Pro Planned Parenthood" is a bad thing. Yes, it's so awful that women can make choices about whether they want children and how many they can have, instead of being barefoot and pregnant all the time like they're supposed to. Dude, hopefully you never breed.

The Retard (otherwise known as Rocky Lore) can't get it past his pea-sized brain that John Edwards was more than happy to take Murdoch's money-and why the fuck shouldn't he? But retards are, well, retarded.

Uh, newsflash stupid liberals. John Edwards took $500,000 from Rupert Murdoch for his book deal. Who did he give that money to? Not to charity as he claims, but to his daughter and one of his staffers! That's hypocrisy right there: Diss Fox, but take money from its head man.

anyone who knows anything knows that Fox news is owned by rupert Murdock......and he has financially supported clinton

Your assessment is totally correct.Sadly nothing can be done as long as there is a demand by certain segments of society for this type of network.

As a person who studied journalism, the FOX "news" establishment is completely against any & all principals of true journalism. What we need to be asking ourselves is just how a network such as this has gained such prominence in this country & what we can do to take back integrity in reporting & news.

Thank you Brave New Films for showing America the reality of FOX's smear campaigns. How people support this is beyond me. The truth is, Murdoch is afraid of John Edwards because he has the backbone to stand up to corporations who are bullying and brainwashing the public into keeping the "status quo".

Raz, I hate to say it but you are the kind of people who scare the hell out of me. Your knee jerk reactions could actually put someone like Hillary or Obama in office. Listen, I can't find one candidate that really stands out as a great leader on either side of the fence. But I would never vote and hand over the keys to someone who has yet to truly explain their views.

Will, apparently this is no record and if there is noone wants to speak of it (he may lose votes)!!!! And if there is; maybe O'reilly can bring it out of him.

Raziorizzo...continuing his onslaught of retarded commentary..."Im still waiting for someone to answer my question of what has Obama done. What is his record?"

Raz is extremely slow on the uptake. Clearly his Walmart bosses like him though. Think about it. An employee that has to pay for all of this waste, pay for his own health care, give more hours to his employer, and avoid the government skum and henchmen that cannot wait to get him trapped in a circular expense account for him.

All that and he still thinks that repube-lichen virtues will save the world. Nobody knows what repube-lichen virtues are though, since it is most obvious that they are not American virtues.

Looks more like traitors trying to get enough for their own by selling out the U.S., and buying votes with my tax dollars.

The other party is doing the same thing.

Vote all of them out.

Don't worry. They don't count the votes anyway.

None of the candidates have said anything about what they would do for this country, and no specifics of any even barely solid plans, yet some have already been weeded out by the press.

Vote for anybody the media refuses to give airtime to.

hey razirio,
Get a life and maybe an eduacation. If you haven't figured out that Bush has flushed the proverbial toilet on America's future, then you just may when, a year from now, the economy will be in shambles, the American dollar will be at an all time low, we'll still be bogged down in civil war in Iraq, you'll still be out of health coverage, no child left behind will still be leaving kids behind, the Middle East will be as chaotic as ever, and of course, the Iranians will be peddling their nukes to numerous terroist groups who want to kill us, . . . the new Islamist Pakistani regime will probably be doing the same. Maybe get outside of Oklahoma for a week or two and trying tuning into something other than Rush Limbaugh or Fox News and you may just get a bit of perspective in your otherwise worthless life.
gmoney
gmoney

Boo Hoo Hoo Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa The misery over the last 8 years. Its been awful Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Im still waiting for someone to answer my question of what has Obama done. What is his record?
Obama scolded Bush for invading Iraq and vowed he would "unequivocally" vote against an additional $87 billion to pay for it.
Yet since taking office in January 2005, he has voted for four separate war appropriations, totaling more than $300 billion
He voted for a Republican-sponsored resolution that stated the Senate would not cut off funding for troops in Iraq.

Hey every body:

FOX SUCK... this S.O.B. are not honest.
Bill O'really should be fired... or decreased his salary from 2,500,000.00 to 80,000.00 a year.