John I understand that alot of Ron Paul's ideas are very crazy including the fact that he is a man who believes alot about strict constitutionalism including abolishing civil rights legislation and the Federal Reserve. But he is really not an extermist Nazi. To call him a crazy Nazi as many have suggested makes me upset because that would be equal to calling Dennis Kucinich (the other Anti-war candidate I support) to a Communist. The crazy neoconized right-wing really want the voices of peace represented by Raul Paul on the right and Dennis Kucinich on the left to be silenced. John, I am an advocate of Free Speach and I strongly opposed the actions of Fox News (Fixed Noise). I believe that we really need a Left-Right Antiwar alliance. The Neocons have been caught in their own crimes. Most of them are known to be loyal servants to the Likud Party and the far-right in Israel. If you want more information John about why we need a an antiwar alliance between the right represented by Ron Paul and the left represented by Dennis Kucinich, then you need to look up the website Antiwar.com. It is a great website made up of people on both the left and right and its chief editor Justin Raimondo has shown us all about the Neocon connections to Likud and the Far-Right in Israel, the Dual loyalties of the Israel Lobby, and also about how the neocons started hijacking our foreign policy in 1997 with the founding of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which led to the two destructive and also illegal wars in both Serbia in 1999 and Iraq in 2003 and the ruining of the United States' reputation around the entire world. John I know alot about Ron Paul as much as I know about Dennis Kucinich. I believe that while his views may be a little extreme the neocons are even worse and their so called plan of building "liberal democracies" around the world through millitary invasions, and/or "color revolutions" are really illegal. It is time that the members of Brave New Films and all Conservative and Progressive organizations who are opposed to war and interventions around the world unite together to exterminate the Neoconservative/Interventionist threat forever. I thank Brave New Films for working hard to fight the misinformation of Fox News. No wonder they hate Ron Paul. But I still think that he is good.

James, you give any psycho with any religious affiliation any power and he'll try and take over the world. It's just a little more effective if you can play the "I'm persecuted" card, which, ironically, Hitler himself did.

You give a Jew a little bit of power and they think they own the world. They belong back where they came from just like some other people

Rohil, thank you. There is a sensitivity that exists which I'm sure you understand. I agree with you totally politically and you are absolutely correct about the neo-con's roots and allegiance to Zionism and the Likud. I see that as a political affiliation. You are also right-on vis-a-vis Rudy Giuliani; he is the very worst of the worst and hopefully you have watched the new BNF video exposing his unconscionable abandonment of the first responders.

I applaud Ron Paul for his anti-war position but I would ask you to take another look at what else he stands for. There are way too many critical problems facing us all today to support a candidate based on a single issue. Strict Constitutionalism does not support or enable progressive thought and values; as evidenced by Ron Paul's rejection of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Thanks for your contributions here; it's great that you are so involved and well informed on so many issues.

Well John I am very sorry. I like Jews and I have alot of Jewish friends. Its just that I really have a negative opinion about the fact that since most of the neocons have allegiances to the Likud Party and the far-right in Israel I wanted everyone here to know that. I also happened to hate Rudy Giuliani and his neocons. I am very sorry to John and the rest of Brave New Films. I am a very big fan of both Congressmen Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich. I like the fact that both of them are anti-Iraq War.

P.S.: Keep up the good work Brave New Films in fighting the Fox News Channel (Fixed Noise Channel).

My name sounds Jewish? Oh I see so you determine what race or religion someone is is by what their name sounds like to you and then you draw innane and off-base consclusions based on that. No wonder you are a Ron Paul supporter. For your information I despise the Likud Party and Zionism and would fall into the extremely pro-Palestinian camp. It's a shame you equate one's condemnation of racism with one's political affiliation.

So it looks as if your blind fervor for your guy and unwillingness to confront the many racist comments he has been responsible for has rendered you incapable of playing with all the other children. The reality is that just like Ross Perot he is a fringe, irrelevent 10% joke for bored college kids.

John Ehrnfeld,

"Likud Jew" is offensive? Your name sounds Jewish and your views sound Likud. If you find it that offensive that you want an apology (you know one of those Rudi-styled "I never heard that explanation") you must be a self-haters.

You actually make a good point that religion should have nothing to do with it. Neither should race. Too bad your later racist accusation of Ron Paul fingers you as a hypcrite through your own written word.

So since you are a racial bigot you must be a religious one as well as much as you protest.

Do you really think anyone will be taken in by this? Even an Israel Jew will have enough intelligence to overcome his feelings of persecution and see through your ploy and recognize the genuine article like Ron Paul when he sees and listens to him.

Wait...I know who your intended audience is.
People like Yitzak Rabin's assasin. I understand
he has recently had a son who needs your guidance.

You need to nurture the kid in case Israel ever
produces another great leader for peace like Rabin for your ilk to kill.

Right; and the strict-constructionists like Scalia, Roberts and Thomas that libertarians worship. You know their God, the "non-breathing" dead Constitution written by slave owners hundreds of years ago. Let's revere that shall we. RP's being opposed to the Civil Right's Act was the tip of the iceberg when it comes to his insanity.

So John EhrenBOY, you say Ron Paul is "a wacko, insignificant, non-factor, racist, libertarian nut job" SO i guess Thomas Jefferson was the same Correct, becuase thats whos Pauls views are modeled after.

Go get me a coffee, One Sugar no cream

Republicans "Do as I Say. Period!"

Rohil, your "Likudnid Jews" comment is pretty offensive. How about just saying Rudy and his neo-con, right-wing cohorts. Their religion has nothing to do with it now does it and I am sure you understand how inflamtory referring to someone you don't like as a "Jew" can be. I'll wait for your apology.

As for Ron Paul; there are two issues. One, of course FOX shouldn't exclude him. it's pretty obvious to all that they don't want him sharing his anti-war views on their station and that they are biased mouthpieces for Bush et all. No surprise there.

Two, and this is a surprise. Why would anyone give a damn about Ron Paul, a wacko, insignificant, non-factor, racist, libertarian nut job. Surely there are other things to talk about.

Like I said before Fixed Noise would like nothing more than to see the half weasel half gerbel with a lisp burrow his way into the whitehouse - if this was halloween I would be Ghouliani - I mean serious it makes me vomit everytime I see him kiss his 20 year looking wife - can you imagine making love to a man who has the appeal of a hunched over desert rodent.

Republicans "Do as i say. Period!"

Well Grayson and Raziorizzo, we all know that the Fixed Noise Channel is now in deep trouble. Only my foolish mother thinks she is not "influenced" by propaganda when in reality Fox is really a propaganda arm for Rudy Giuliani and his neocon-right-wing Likudnid Jews who should be deported back to the state of Israel. Look at the anger at Fox when Vladimir Putin was named the Person of the Year. They wanted instead General David Petreaus. How stupid.

Duh the answer is yes.
CNN is also trying to undermine him, as clearly demonstrated by idiotic questions they asked him during the CNN/YouTube debate.

As far as Ron Paul not being in the debate. Just another example of fair and belanced, becuase fox news does not like what Paul has to say lets exclude him. Fox news would rather let an IDIOT like Alan Keyes debate than Paul. Also Fox doesnt like what huckabee has to say either considering the recent attacks by Hannity and Limbaugh. WHy? becuase Huckabee is not a corporate republican, THANK GOD! Fox would love to see that midget weasel half gopher with a LISP Guiliani become the next corporate war president!!!!

Grayson - How is that you support fox news and there bias, when it is obvious you are commenting on a website which PROVES that fox is bias and our the cheerleaders not only for bush but the republican party!!!! Shouldnt you be posting on rush limbaugh or redstate.com so you and your redneck friends can rally around your comments!

Rupublicans "Do as I say. Period."

Ron Paul leads Thompson by 6 percent according to polls in New Hampshire!

But Fox News refusal to allow Ron Paul to speak demonstrates they are not a News Agency – But a tabloid that seeks only to support biased agenda

This makes Fox a Tabloid - Not a news agency!

Grayson, thank God there haven't been any hurricanes for Bush to ignore or new wars for him to invent. We still haven't recovered from the last ones.

So a candidate who represents 10% of your party doesn't deserve to be in a debate? Why not?

Grayson, usually I find your posts entertaining and it's clear you're no dummy, but sometimes we "liberals" can be right about somethings. Fox has an agenda and in my opinion, it is to mold public consensus towards a very focused conclusion. Honestly, I haven't watched much Fox, but when I do, I find myself scratching my head, wondering how a "news organization" can offer so little news and so much opinion, not even during their prime-time block. If you can find examples of CNN, MSNBC and the other networks doing the same, please share them with us. I recall a Fox piece 3 years ago where the anchor told America that Hillary Clinton would never be elected President. Whether he is right or wrong, a news anchor should be impartial, and not trying to sway people's opinions. Notice, I have never posted here and made anti-Bush statements, just what I believe are reasonable observations about the "most powerful name in news."

Frankly, I can't understand how Giuliani who gets 5% in Iowa gets to be in the debate but Paul who gets 10% doesn't.

Fox logic.