I never thought I would see the day a former Slave (first nation in world history to based Slavery on color) owing nation, would have White citizens telling American Blacks "you are lucky to be Black".

I don't know whether to laugh or look away in disgust at the old adage, "desperation breeds contempt", evident in the race statement from the Hillery camp. This actually goes hand in hand with her attempt to play Latinos against Blacks.

What a nasty, despicable woman she is.

P.S. Mr. Stein (below), THAT was a brilliant analogy!

Pat Buchanan,

With the greatest respect....

I am a Right leaning, Bush voting, capitalist, University of Chicago graduate, Milton Friedman loving, white male, hunter.

Please take a minute… you are caught in some bad logic.

What is currently being offered (by Ferraro, Hannity, and yourself) is opinion (not a fact) of a current social trend.

Historical number of black Senators? 5

Historical number of black Presidents? 0

"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman [of any color] he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

Let me re-phrase with historical accuracy.

"Inspite of Obama not being white, he is in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be in this position particularly with regards to whom he is and our nations political history. Maybe the body politic is ready to move beyond their barriers to race."

Are there voters who like Obama because he has color? Yes.

Does that make Obama's color an asset over being white? No.

History clearly shows that being white is an asset over having color.

To say that George W is the President because of his father is historically accurate.

George W Bush had a father who was a President.

To say that Hillary is a potential President because of her husband is historically accurate.

Hillary had a husband who was a President.

To say that Obama could be President because of his color (or is lucky to be who he is with regards to his color) is historically inaccurate.

To make (non-disparaging) remarks regarding race that are historically inaccurate in an effort to discount a candidate is not racist... but it is politically motivated and illogical.

To make (non-disparaging) illogical remarks regarding race in an effort to make race a central theme that discourages people from voting for a candidate is racist.

The irony is that this tactic uses a political liability (Obama's color) against him without taking responsibility... this "is" very Clinton.

Please don’t help the Clintons.

I am very open to voting for McCain.

I am very closed to voting against Obama.

Respectfully Submitted

I saw the show last night and was in total shock when Pat told Keli Goff to Shut up. Rachel's my girl; she step to Pat. While the host, Dan Abrams, called for silence, Rachel told Pat all about himself and Pat sat his racist butt up there and took it like a good boy! It was much watch tv. I got up at 4am to tape it when it repeated this morning!!

Thanks for posting this. I didn't see Abrams show -- wished I had seen the whole segment.

I often find Buchanan makes good points. His racism is in the way of his brain and his manners.

Yea for these two women not letting him get away with false logic and rudeness.