It may be typical O'Reilly but, few who attack him and are invited on the show to back up their rantings with fact, ever show up? And those that do, are always treated with respect. What's shameful is the cowards who sit in some office or TV station and rant and rave yet, never show up to rant and rave in his face! What's up with that?

This is just so comical. Anyone who finds any credibility with this bunch is nuts!

On August 2, 1952, the weekly magazine Collier's published the following editorial, entitled "McCarthy Cries Again," as took issue with Sen. Joseph McCarthy's campaigns of smearing certain media outlets as "Communist sympathisers" for daring to attack his methods of exposing real or suspected Communists and the danger posed by Communism.

IMHO, what was true in 1952 with Sen. McCarthy may hold just as true today with Fox News Prolefeed and their droogs in the Dark Satanic Mills of Conservative Propaganda and Misinformation:

A couple of years ago Senator Joe McCarthy buckled on his armor and, like a twentieth-century Don Quixote, set out to slay the dragon of American Communism singlehanded. His intentions seemed noble as those of the good knight. But also like the good knight, who attacked a procession of monks and a flock of sheep under the impression that they were brigands and ogres, he got a little confused about the targets of his sallies.

Thus it has come to pass, as his crusade continues, that anyone who takes issue with him assumes the look of the Red dragon itself. Disagreement becomes lies or crookedness. An adverse editorial comment is automatically a “left-wing smear.” And the senator charges treason against a countryman as recklessly as Don Quixote charged the windmill.

Mr. McCarthy has had a busy time of it, because there are a great many people who approve the purpose of his crusade, but object strongly to his methods. There are many publications which feel the same way. One of them is Collier’s. Another is Time. And we at Collier’s feel just a little discriminated against because, so far, the senator has ignored us while singling out Time and accusing it of “twisting and distorting the facts about my (McCarthy’s) fight to expose and remove Communists from government.”

This charge apparently grew out of a Time cover story on Senator McCarthy. The senator had earlier attacked it as a “vicious and malicious lie.” But recently he employed a new tactic which was definitely not cricket.

Backed by the prestige of his office, he sent a letter to “practically all Time advertisers,” according to his own statement, which, while it did not come right out and ask them to take their business elsewhere, suggested that they were doing their country a disservice by their continued support of the magazine.

Since some of these advertisers were “not aware of the facts,” the letter stated, they were “unknowingly helping to pollute and poison the waterholes of information.” Still swimming along in his aquatic metaphor, the senator said that “it is much more important to expose a liar, a crook or a traitor who is able to poison the streams of information flowing into a vast number of American homes than to expose an equally vicious crook, liar or traitor who has no magazine or newspaper outlet for his poison.”

The source of the senator’s “facts” was an article from the American Mercury and a reprint from the Congressional Record. On the basis of these, the gentleman who complains about distortions and smears virtually accused Time’s editors of dishonesty and treason in so many words.

Naturally Mr. McCarthy anticipated some criticism. “I realize,” he said, “that bringing these facts to the attention of Time’s advertisers will cause some of the unthinking to shout that this is endangering ‘freedom of the press.’” But, he added, “To allow a liar to hide behind the cry ‘You are endangering freedom of the press’ is not only ridiculous, it is dangerous.”

To this we can only answer that when a man hides behind the cry “You are a liar” before anyone has accused him of endangering freedom of the press, he must be feeling rather insecure. And when he tries to intimidate a critical publication by seeking to alienate its chief sources of revenue, he is something less than courageous.

Senator McCarthy has set himself up as the final authority on loyalty and Americanism. He insists that his accusations are not to be doubted, and his judgment is not to be questioned. Yet, a few weeks after he wrote his letter to Time’s advertisers, he testified in Syracuse, New York that the Washington Post and the New York (Communist) Daily Worker “parallel each other quite closely in editorials.” And when he was asked whether he would consider the Christian Science Monitor a “left-wing smear paper,” he replied, “I can’t answer yes or no.”

Those are the statements of a man who is either woefully unperceptive or wholly irresponsible. And when such a man asks that his wild-swinging attacks be accepted without question, he is, to borrow his own words, not only ridiculous but dangerous.

We are not concerned that, on the basis of this editorial, the senator may now add us to his company of “left-wing smearers,” or that he may also warn our advertisers of the danger of supporting another publication which pollutes the waterholes of information. What does concern us is the real danger of Communist infiltration in government, and the fact that this danger is too serious to be obscured and clouded by Senator McCarthy’s eccentricities, exaggerations and absurdities.

====================

"Don't read the headlines; read (and shop) The Exaggerator: Smartness, with just a hint of pretension."

Bill knows what he is doing it is all for ratings. The crazier you act the more attention you get. He and 80% of Fox News have prejudice views and represent the portion of Americans that want everything back like it was in the "Good Ole 1950's". He is not stupid he does lack integrity.

What BillO says about NBC should be applied to Faux.

Scott McClellan is Buzzflash's hypocrite of the week.

Funny stuff!Typical O'Bully!

<object height="355" width="425"><param></param><param></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VLuj1705u24&hl=en" height="355" width="425"></embed></object>