nice lisp ; i notice you really like the word "fallacious"

that's hot

just switch "god" with "FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER", I AM EXTREMELY OFFENDED BY YOUR COMPARISON OF YOUR BIBLE god WITH THE REAL SPAGHETTI MAN GOD, REPENT YOU ASSHOLE!

same argument asshole!

all of this lovely logic is used to defend the real GOD --the flying spaghetti man.

idiot

Read Richard Dawkins's "The God Delusion". He reasons better than you and he's defeated all of your arguments.

Ludicrous hardly suffices to describe this farrago. Dishonest is probably better. For example, you premise a child killed by fire and posit the question, how could God permit this evil? Then you immediately change the subject to the children who weren't killed. In logic this is called misdirection (or "red herring"). It's as if a bank robber sought to be acquitted because of all the banks he didn't rob!
Your knowledge of physics is deficient. How do you know that the Universe had a beginning? What is the evidence for it? Physicists don't know this. They do know that current theories reach a mathematical singularity at some time in the remote past, beyond which the theories break down, but this is not equivalent to a beginning. It's like sayiing that the Earth doesn't exist beyond the horizon, because you can't see past it.
"Free will"? Here's more bad logic on your part. God could have given men free will and in addition sufficient wisdom and understanding always to choose the good. He did not do so. If you put a small child beside a hot stove and he burns himself, it's not because he lacks free will. It's because he lacks the wisdom to make safe decisions. Who is to blame for his injury? Not the child! God chose to make men fallible and then punishes them for their mistakes. This is evil on an unimaginable scale.