you know i liked this website......up until this video. for once i think fox could be right..... compare Co2 emmissons from people to...volcanoes ? the sea ? animals ? im pretty sure that we hav an extremely little impact on our climate. I also think that hmmmm.....strangely.....the sun spot's change in temperature pretty much equal the change in temperature on earth. and Co2 ? well look it up and you'll find no record of Co2 determining and of the other ice ages.... :D

If global warming were such a problem, then Al Gore shouldn't be flying around in private jets, Robert F. Kennedy Jr should sell his mansion, and Arianna Huffington better stop accepting chauffeured rides in SUVs to her Sierra Club meetings.

U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007

Senate Report Debunks "Consensus"

Complete U.S. Senate Report Now Available: (LINK)
Complete Report w/out Intro: (LINK)

INTRODUCTION:

Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.

The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.

Even some in the establishment media now appear to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics "appear to be expanding rather than shrinking." Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bite the dust.” (LINK) In addition, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has "co-opted" the green movement. (LINK)

This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.

Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution. Atmospheric scientist Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, author of almost 70 peer-reviewed studies, explains how many of his fellow scientists have been intimidated.

“Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media,” Paldor wrote. [Note: See also July 2007 Senate report detailing how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation - LINK ]

Scientists from Around the World Dissent

This new report details how teams of international scientists are dissenting from the UN IPCC’s view of climate science. In such nations as Germany, Brazil, the Netherlands, Russia, New Zealand and France, nations, scientists banded together in 2007 to oppose climate alarmism. In addition, over 100 prominent international scientists sent an open letter in December 2007 to the UN stating attempts to control climate were “futile.” (LINK)

Paleoclimatologist Dr. Tim Patterson, professor in the department of Earth Sciences at Carleton University in Ottawa, recently converted from a believer in man-made climate change to a skeptic. Patterson noted that the notion of a “consensus” of scientists aligned with the UN IPCC or former Vice President Al Gore is false. “I was at the Geological Society of America meeting in Philadelphia in the fall and I would say that people with my opinion were probably in the majority.”

This new committee report, a first of its kind, comes after the UN IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri implied that there were only “about a dozen" skeptical scientists left in the world. (LINK) Former Vice President Gore has claimed that scientists skeptical of climate change are akin to “flat Earth society members” and similar in number to those who “believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona.” (LINK) & (LINK)

The distinguished scientists featured in this new report are experts in diverse fields, including: climatology; oceanography; geology; biology; glaciology; biogeography; meteorology; oceanography; economics; chemistry; mathematics; environmental sciences; engineering; physics and paleoclimatology. Some of those profiled have won Nobel Prizes for their outstanding contribution to their field of expertise and many shared a portion of the UN IPCC Nobel Peace Prize with Vice President Gore.

Additionally, these scientists hail from prestigious institutions worldwide, including: Harvard University; NASA; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR); Massachusetts Institute of Technology; the UN IPCC; the Danish National Space Center; U.S. Department of Energy; Princeton University; the Environmental Protection Agency; University of Pennsylvania; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; the International Arctic Research Centre; the Pasteur Institute in Paris; the Belgian Weather Institute; Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute; the University of Helsinki; the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S., France, and Russia; the University of Pretoria; University of Notre Dame; Stockholm University; University of Melbourne; University of Columbia; the World Federation of Scientists; and the University of London.

The voices of many of these hundreds of scientists serve as a direct challenge to the often media-hyped “consensus” that the debate is “settled.”

A May 2007 Senate report detailed scientists who had recently converted from believers in man-made global warming to skepticism. [See May 15, 2007 report: Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics: Growing Number of Scientists Convert to Skeptics After Reviewing New Research – (LINK) ]

The report counters the claims made by the promoters of man-made global warming fears that the number of skeptical scientists is dwindling.

Examples of “consensus” claims made by promoters of man-made climate fears:

Former Vice President Al Gore (November 5, 2007): “There are still people who believe that the Earth is flat.” (LINK) Gore also compared global warming skeptics to people who 'believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona' (June 20, 2006 - LINK)

CNN’s Miles O’Brien (July 23, 2007): The scientific debate is over.” “We're done." O’Brien also declared on CNN on February 9, 2006 that scientific skeptics of man-made catastrophic global warming “are bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry, usually.” (LINK)

On July 27, 2006, Associated Press reporter Seth Borenstein described a scientist as “one of the few remaining scientists skeptical of the global warming harm caused by industries that burn fossil fuels.” (LINK)

Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC view on the number of skeptical scientists as quoted on Feb. 20, 2003: “About 300 years ago, a Flat Earth Society was founded by those who did not believe the world was round. That society still exists; it probably has about a dozen members.” (LINK)

Agence France-Press (AFP Press) article (December 4, 2007): The article noted that a prominent skeptic “finds himself increasingly alone in his claim that climate change poses no imminent threat to the planet.”

Andrew Dessler in the eco-publication Grist Magazine (November 21, 2007): “While some people claim there are lots of skeptical climate scientists out there, if you actually try to find one, you keep turning up the same two dozen or so (e.g., Singer, Lindzen, Michaels, Christy, etc., etc.). These skeptics are endlessly recycled by the denial machine, so someone not paying close attention might think there are lots of them out there -- but that's not the case. (LINK)

The Washington Post asserted on May 23, 2006 that there were only “a handful of skeptics” of man-made climate fears. (LINK)

UN special climate envoy Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland on May 10, 2007 declared the climate debate "over" and added “it's completely immoral, even, to question” the UN’s scientific “consensus." (LINK)

ABC News Global Warming Reporter Bill Blakemore reported on August 30, 2006: “After extensive searches, ABC News has found no such [scientific] debate” on global warming. (LINK)

# #

Brief highlights of the report featuring over 400 international scientists:

Israel: Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem has authored almost 70 peer-reviewed studies and won several awards. “First, temperature changes, as well as rates of temperature changes (both increase and decrease) of magnitudes similar to that reported by IPCC to have occurred since the Industrial revolution (about 0.8C in 150 years or even 0.4C in the last 35 years) have occurred in Earth's climatic history. There's nothing special about the recent rise!”

Russia: Russian scientist Dr. Oleg Sorochtin of the Institute of Oceanology at the Russian Academy of Sciences has authored more than 300 studies, nine books, and a 2006 paper titled “The Evolution and the Prediction of Global Climate Changes on Earth.” “Even if the concentration of ‘greenhouse gases’ double man would not perceive the temperature impact,” Sorochtin wrote.

Spain: Anton Uriarte, a professor of Physical Geography at the University of the Basque Country in Spain and author of a book on the paleoclimate, rejected man-made climate fears in 2007. “There's no need to be worried. It's very interesting to study [climate change], but there's no need to be worried,” Uriate wrote.

Netherlands: Atmospheric scientist Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, a scientific pioneer in the development of numerical weather prediction and former director of research at The Netherlands' Royal National Meteorological Institute, and an internationally recognized expert in atmospheric boundary layer processes, “I find the Doomsday picture Al Gore is painting – a six-meter sea level rise, fifteen times the IPCC number – entirely without merit,” Tennekes wrote. “I protest vigorously the idea that the climate reacts like a home heating system to a changed setting of the thermostat: just turn the dial, and the desired temperature will soon be reached."

Brazil: Chief Meteorologist Eugenio Hackbart of the MetSul Meteorologia Weather Center in Sao Leopoldo – Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil declared himself a skeptic. “The media is promoting an unprecedented hyping related to global warming. The media and many scientists are ignoring very important facts that point to a natural variation in the climate system as the cause of the recent global warming,” Hackbart wrote on May 30, 2007.

France: Climatologist Dr. Marcel Leroux, former professor at Université Jean Moulin and director of the Laboratory of Climatology, Risks, and Environment in Lyon, is a climate skeptic. Leroux wrote a 2005 book titled Global Warming – Myth or Reality? - The Erring Ways of Climatology. “Day after day, the same mantra - that ‘the Earth is warming up’ - is churned out in all its forms. As ‘the ice melts’ and ‘sea level rises,’ the Apocalypse looms ever nearer! Without realizing it, or perhaps without wishing to, the average citizen in bamboozled, lobotomized, lulled into mindless ac­ceptance. ... Non-believers in the greenhouse scenario are in the position of those long ago who doubted the existence of God ... fortunately for them, the Inquisition is no longer with us!”

Norway: Geologist/Geochemist Dr. Tom V. Segalstad, a professor and head of the Geological Museum at the University of Oslo and formerly an expert reviewer with the UN IPCC: “It is a search for a mythical CO2 sink to explain an immeasurable CO2 lifetime to fit a hypothetical CO2 computer model that purports to show that an impossible amount of fossil fuel burning is heating the atmosphere. It is all a fiction.”

Finland: Dr. Boris Winterhalter, retired Senior Marine Researcher of the Geological Survey of Finland and former professor of marine geology at University of Helsinki, criticized the media for what he considered its alarming climate coverage. “The effect of solar winds on cosmic radiation has just recently been established and, furthermore, there seems to be a good correlation between cloudiness and variations in the intensity of cosmic radiation. Here we have a mechanism which is a far better explanation to variations in global climate than the attempts by IPCC to blame it all on anthropogenic input of greenhouse gases. “

Germany: Paleoclimate expert Augusto Mangini of the University of Heidelberg in Germany, criticized the UN IPCC summary. “I consider the part of the IPCC report, which I can really judge as an expert, i.e. the reconstruction of the paleoclimate, wrong,” Mangini noted in an April 5, 2007 article. He added: “The earth will not die.”

Canada: IPCC 2007 Expert Reviewer Madhav Khandekar, a Ph.D meteorologist, a scientist with the Natural Resources Stewardship Project who has over 45 years experience in climatology, meteorology and oceanography, and who has published nearly 100 papers, reports, book reviews and a book on Ocean Wave Analysis and Modeling: “To my dismay, IPCC authors ignored all my comments and suggestions for major changes in the FOD (First Order Draft) and sent me the SOD (Second Order Draft) with essentially the same text as the FOD. None of the authors of the chapter bothered to directly communicate with me (or with other expert reviewers with whom I communicate on a regular basis) on many issues that were raised in my review. This is not an acceptable scientific review process.”

Czech Republic: Czech-born U.S. climatologist Dr. George Kukla, a research scientist with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University, expressed climate skepticism in 2007. “The only thing to worry about is the damage that can be done by worrying. Why are some scientists worried? Perhaps because they feel that to stop worrying may mean to stop being paid,” Kukla told Gelf Magazine on April 24, 2007.

India: One of India's leading geologists, B.P. Radhakrishna, President of the Geological Society of India, expressed climate skepticism in 2007. “We appear to be overplaying this global warming issue as global warming is nothing new. It has happened in the past, not once but several times, giving rise to glacial-interglacial cycles.”

USA: Climatologist Robert Durrenberger, past president of the American Association of State Climatologists, and one of the climatologists who gathered at Woods Hole to review the National Climate Program Plan in July, 1979: “Al Gore brought me back to the battle and prompted me to do renewed research in the field of climatology. And because of all the misinformation that Gore and his army have been spreading about climate change I have decided that ‘real’ climatologists should try to help the public understand the nature of the problem.”

Italy: Internationally renowned scientist Dr. Antonio Zichichi, president of the World Federation of Scientists and a retired Professor of Advanced Physics at the University of Bologna in Italy, who has published over 800 scientific papers: “Significant new peer-reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human-caused global warming."

New Zealand: IPCC reviewer and climate researcher Dr. Vincent Gray, an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports going back to 1990 and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of "Climate Change 2001: “The [IPCC] ‘Summary for Policymakers’ might get a few readers, but the main purpose of the report is to provide a spurious scientific backup for the absurd claims of the worldwide environmentalist lobby that it has been established scientifically that increases in carbon dioxide are harmful to the climate. It just does not matter that this ain't so.”

South Africa: Dr. Kelvin Kemm, formerly a scientist at South Africa’s Atomic Energy Corporation who holds degrees in nuclear physics and mathematics: “The global-warming mania continues with more and more hype and less and less thinking. With religious zeal, people look for issues or events to blame on global warming.”

Poland: Physicist Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, Chairman of the Central Laboratory for the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Radiological Protection in Warsaw: ““We thus find ourselves in the situation that the entire theory of man-made global warming—with its repercussions in science, and its important consequences for politics and the global economy—is based on ice core studies that provided a false picture of the atmospheric CO2 levels.”

Australia: Prize-wining Geologist Dr. Ian Plimer, a professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Adelaide in Australia: "There is new work emerging even in the last few weeks that shows we can have a very close correlation between the temperatures of the Earth and supernova and solar radiation.”

Britain: Dr. Richard Courtney, a UN IPCC expert reviewer and a UK-based climate and atmospheric science consultant: “To date, no convincing evidence for AGW (anthropogenic global warming) has been discovered. And recent global climate behavior is not consistent with AGW model predictions.”

China: Chinese Scientists Say C02 Impact on Warming May Be ‘Excessively Exaggerated’ – Scientists Lin Zhen-Shan’s and Sun Xian’s 2007 study published in the peer-reviewed journal Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics: "Although the CO2 greenhouse effect on global climate change is unsuspicious, it could have been excessively exaggerated." Their study asserted that "it is high time to reconsider the trend of global climate change.”

Denmark: Space physicist Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen is the director of the Danish National Space Centre, a member of the space research advisory committee of the Swedish National Space Board, a member of a NASA working group, and a member of the European Space Agency who has authored or co-authored around 100 peer-reviewed papers and chairs the Institute of Space Physics: “The sun is the source of the energy that causes the motion of the atmosphere and thereby controls weather and climate. Any change in the energy from the sun received at the Earth’s surface will therefore affect climate.”

Belgium: Climate scientist Luc Debontridder of the Belgium Weather Institute’s Royal Meteorological Institute (RMI) co-authored a study in August 2007 which dismissed a decisive role of CO2 in global warming: "CO2 is not the big bogeyman of climate change and global warming. “Not CO2, but water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. It is responsible for at least 75 % of the greenhouse effect. This is a simple scientific fact, but Al Gore's movie has hyped CO2 so much that nobody seems to take note of it.”

Sweden: Geologist Dr. Wibjorn Karlen, professor emeritus of the Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology at Stockholm University, critiqued the Associated Press for hyping promoting climate fears in 2007. “Another of these hysterical views of our climate. Newspapers should think about the damage they are doing to many persons, particularly young kids, by spreading the exaggerated views of a human impact on climate.”

USA: Dr. David Wojick is a UN IPCC expert reviewer, who earned his PhD in Philosophy of Science and co-founded the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie-Mellon University: “In point of fact, the hypothesis that solar variability and not human activity is warming the oceans goes a long way to explain the puzzling idea that the Earth's surface may be warming while the atmosphere is not. The GHG (greenhouse gas) hypothesis does not do this.” Wojick added: “The public is not well served by this constant drumbeat of false alarms fed by computer models manipulated by advocates.”

# # #

Background: Only 52 Scientists Participated in UN IPCC Summary

The over 400 skeptical scientists featured in this new report outnumber by nearly eight times the number of scientists who participated in the 2007 UN IPCC Summary for Policymakers. The notion of “hundreds” or “thousands” of UN scientists agreeing to a scientific statement does not hold up to scrutiny. (See report debunking “consensus” LINK) Recent research by Australian climate data analyst Dr. John McLean revealed that the IPCC’s peer-review process for the Summary for Policymakers leaves much to be desired. (LINK)

Proponents of man-made global warming like to note how the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the American Meteorological Society (AMS) have issued statements endorsing the so-called "consensus" view that man is driving global warming. But both the NAS and AMS never allowed member scientists to directly vote on these climate statements. Essentially, only two dozen or so members on the governing boards of these institutions produced the "consensus" statements. This report gives a voice to the rank-and-file scientists who were shut out of the process. (LINK)

The most recent attempt to imply there was an overwhelming scientific “consensus” in favor of man-made global warming fears came in December 2007 during the UN climate conference in Bali. A letter signed by only 215 scientists urged the UN to mandate deep cuts in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. But absent from the letter were the signatures of these alleged “thousands” of scientists. (See AP article: - LINK )

UN IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri urged the world at the December 2007 UN climate conference in Bali, Indonesia to "Please listen to the voice of science.”

The science has continued to grow loud and clear in 2007. In addition to the growing number of scientists expressing skepticism, an abundance of recent peer-reviewed studies have cast considerable doubt about man-made global warming fears. A November 3, 2007 peer-reviewed study found that “solar changes significantly alter climate.” (LINK) A December 2007 peer-reviewed study recalculated and halved the global average surface temperature trend between 1980 – 2002. (LINK) Another new study found the Medieval Warm Period “0.3C warmer than 20th century” (LINK)

A peer-reviewed study by a team of scientists found that "warming is naturally caused and shows no human influence." (LINK) – Another November 2007 peer-reviewed study in the journal Physical Geography found “Long-term climate change is driven by solar insolation changes.” (LINK ) These recent studies were in addition to the abundance of peer-reviewed studies earlier in 2007. - See "New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears" (LINK )

With this new report of profiling 400 skeptical scientists, the world can finally hear the voices of the “silent majority” of scientists.

LINKS TO COMPLETE U.S. SENATE REPORT: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007

Complete Report: (LINK) (Released December 20, 2007)

Complete Report w/out Intro: (LINK)

# # #

You people are the biggest idiots and fools this planet has had to bear with since it came into existence. "There's no such thing as global warming","It's just a hoax","Forget all the evidence about how the weather is changing and how we're getting our ass handed over in a platter by mother nature","Oh didn't you know? Katrina never happened, it was just a hoax made up by poor black people in some backwater state","Carbon Monoxide dangerous? Pssht! What will these "liberals" make up next? The ices at the poles are melting?".

Damned stupid fools, I hope the lot of you die in the most painful way immaginable. The worst part about you guys being stupid is the fact that you believe the dumbest person alive: George W. Bush.

Of course it's been removed; insane crap doesn't deserve the light of day. People who are global warming deniers are not just harmless children mouthing some political platitudes - they are dangerous fools whose beliefs threaten our planet and our children's lives.

Liberal? Ha. Right.

I'm a liberal, but the conservative view on global warming is dead on. It is a natural relationship and cycle. Check out The Great Global Warming Swindle for more information. I don't know where you can find it anymore, it used to be on joox and stage 6 videos, but it's been removed. If you can find it somewhere, I recommend you watch it.

We live in a state of corporate fascism, treating this planet as business in liquidation, exhausting its resources and destroying its environment. Man is but one species amongst billions of other species on this planet. No one gave man dominion on this planet except man himself. How egotistic has he become?! Nature’s god is angry at us. Shame ---Shame…
It all boils down to what Reagan did in 1988, bowing to pressure from the right, by abolishing the “Fairness Doctrine". The fairness doctrine was the law of the land since 1932. Abolishing the fairness doctrine allowed channels like Fox News and Rush Limbaugh to come to existence. Ninety two percent (92%) of radio talk show hosts now are right wingers. Public airwaves belong to the public and the fairness doctrine must be restored. Insist that the presidential candidates promise to restore the fairness doctrine and to bust the 5 media monopolies which control our thought process. Demand public finance of election.

It all boils down to what Reagan did in 1988 bowing to pressure from the right: "Abolishing the Fairness Doctrine" which allowed channels like Fox News and Rush Limbaugh to exist. 92% of radio talk show hosts are right wing persuasion. Public airwaves belong to the public and the fairness doctrine must be restored. Insist that the presidential candidates promise to restore the fairness doctrine and bust the 5 media monopolies which control our thought process.

I like this site because it points out the many flaws of Fox News. But ...

The problem is that most of the people posting on this site are as brain washed as the people on Fox News. Please don't be like Fox News or the viewers of Fox News and do some more research yourself. I suggest the top video on this page, www.newswithviews.com Global Warming or Global Governance. I'm not asking you to believe it, I'm just asking you to consider it. You can also find many scientists and that are against the Global Warming hype that aren't funded by oil companies. A lot of you also forgot to mention all of the huge corporations that Al Gore owns and how he uses Global warming to advertise for them.

Global warming has been occuring since the last ice age ended. The earth goes through normal cycles, but hey a few years of "resarch" can't be wrong. Everyone should run and panic.

Tell it like it is! This website is more leftist propaganda for the embittered lemmings. On Iraq, you think the good fairy came and took the gas they used on the kurds? Not WMD enough for you? Global warming, When someone can accuratley predict the weather two weeks in advance I might take another look at their being able to summarize hundreds of years of the complex entity we refer to as weather.

Get a grip!

You know I love how everyone is agreeing, I swear man, I didn't see a single disagreement comment on here? What does that say to me? foxattacks.com is like fox, they filter out things that they don't want heard. Now I don't believe in Global Warming (this comment will be filtered out most likely, and if not it will be used as an example of "see we let everyone post their opinion").

Seriously I want to make a news show where nothing is filtered out leaving only the viewers to decide (or not, depend on what they fell comfortable tackling).

Great approach-now say Fox Opinion Media not News

Just moved in. A few more boxes to put away and I am going to dedicate one hour a day out of my office duties (work @ home) to calling, etc. and getting the word out about how we feel about Fox news and it's attacks. Slowly, but surely, more and more people are understanding what FOX news is really about. I would like to bop that Dennis Miller on the head. What a messiah complex that guy has... they all do! Oh.. and can someone please explain to me why a smart guy like Adam Sandler would be a Republican?

Hey if you want unbiased, independent news, watch LinkTV! It is not sponsored by ads, it is viewer funded. Now it truly Rocks!

WHERE ARE THE STANDARD WEBPAGE VIDEO PLAYERS?:

I've always wondered as to what is up with all of these video players including the ones that are connected with Yahoo even in thier news stories because I cannot get an easy one to download that will play the videos standard, I keep getting a message that says 'We Cannot Procede' in Yahoo, you need a video player that supports the format because I can't even open the YouTube from the YouTube webpage.

I'm a little troubled by the comments of Teddy Jack Eddie a few days ago. Yes, the liberals are to blame for a lot of our social ills including Political Correctness - gack. However, Conservative of Liberal...if you ACTUALLY have a brain and live some where other than under an Exxon Mobil Oil Tank with money raining from the sky on your 'bad self'..then you surely must exercise some independent thought and realize that Global Warming is in fact a real threat to our PLANET!!! Sorry if that interferes with your ability to make more money at the expense of everything but YOU!!!

WAKE UP AMERICA - get over past Your POLITICS and pay attention to your MOTHER (earth)!!!

To ignour it could be disasterous; facing it and repairing it has no guarantees either. But we must try! We have no choice. We may have gone too far already. Start making better choices Today! 1

Who are these idiots who deny anthropogenic global warming?

Answer: they are paid agents of disinformation... (Google 'century of the self' and learn about the public relations industry.)

HUGE profits for oil companies lately...Exxon Mobil is up 36% (http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/27/news/companies/exxon/index.htm)

Do you think Exxon Mobil wants to curb emission standards? No, they are mandated by their shareholders to sell product. So they hire pseudo-scientific "experts" to muddy the waters of clarity.

Millions paid to 'think tanks' ... these uninformed douchebags are the ones on Fox who deny global warming!

Here is an article about that:

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2612021&page=1

To the deniers here... my question is, why do you brownose an industry that is taking a huge shit in your face?

I don't watch Fox News. They just happen to be the big rabid dog of corporatized news. I unplugged my cable TV service a year ago. Instead, I watch Democracy Now! and C-Span free on the web.

Fox is the same as the Pseudo Christian. Spin doctors { with great words and great speeches they shall deceive the hearts of the simple} GET SMART AND TUNE IN TO- Sam Sedar, Mike Melloy, Randi Rhodes. My favorite is the retired attorney JACK CLARK. He speaks with facts. Read history by Kenneth c. Davis. Listen to speaches by F.D.R. AND LAST SPEACHES OF MARTIN LUTHER KING ON THE VIETNAM WAR:

Fox News....We Report....You decide. You guys can't handle the truth about your gay party views and how Fox News (the leader) exposes your hidden agendas on how to corrupt America. Why don't you all go listen some more to Air America. Oh wait! That failed miserably and couldn't even support itself with millions of dollars from supporters. It is a fact that crime has risen every year since 1959 since the liberals were given a voice. No more! Fox News can't be stopped! You are out numbered 7 to 1. Good luck! Maybe you should have some more intercourse with your dog. Fox News Rules! Dow Jones Rules!

It is unfortunate that people with money attempt to dominate and control human behavior. In a true Democracy, fair and fact filled journalism would cover all aspects of a situation and the honest truth would be presented to the general public. Much of today's T.V. News is both economically and politically motivated and the Fox channel is the worst at not presenting the honest facts. The causes of Global warming can be discovered on the NASA Web Site as presented to the general public by the best scientists on Earth. ----- Original Message -----
From: <eoannounce>
To: <eo-announce>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 6:15 PM
Subject: Earth Observatory: What's New Week of 31 July 2007
> The latest from NASA's Earth Observatory (31 July 2007)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> New Features:
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> * Science Blog - Expedition to Siberia
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
> As Earth's average temperature rises, and most rapidly in the high latitudes, what is happening to the great northern forests of Siberia? Join scientists from NASA and Russia's Academy of Science on an expedition down the Kochechum River in north-central Siberia as they go in search of answers. You can follow the expedition each day in the Earth Observatory's first-ever science blog.
>
> --------------------
>
> In the News:
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> * Latest Images:
> Global Carbon Monoxide in September 2005
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> Fires in Southern Europe
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> Hurricane-Ready Waters in the Atlantic
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> Kilauea Volcano
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> Brooklyn, New York Waterfront
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> Smoke over Hudson Bay
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> Fires on the Balkan Peninsula
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> Tungsten and Thomas Fires, Nevada
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
>
> * NASA News
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
> - It's Not Your Father's Earth Science Class!
> - Teacher Partners with NASA for Cloud Research
> - New NASA AIRS Data to Aid Weather, Climate Research
>
> * Media Alerts
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
> - Atlantic Hurricane Frequency Doubles
> - New Clues to Ozone Depletion
> - Ozone Reduces Plant Growth, Adds to Global Warming
>
> * Headlines from the press, radio, and television:
> earthobservatory.nasa.gov
> - Gulf Coast "Dead Zone" Still Large
> - Hurricane Boost 'Due to Warm Sea'
> - Earth's Crust is Just Like Pizza Dough
> - Iodine Enters the Climate-Change Mix
> - Underground 'Snowy River' Alive Again
> - ‘Space Arrow’ to Map Earth’s Tug
> - Stronger Hurricanes Mean Whopper Waves
> - UK Forecasts to Zoom in on Towns
> - Possible Mud Volcano Erupts Near Trinidad
> - Measuring The Retreat History Of Alpine Glaciers
> - Major Quake, Tsunami Likely in Middle East, Study Finds
> - Erosion May Send Alaska Oil Wells into the Ocean
> - Nevada has Big Temperature Gains
> - Ozone has ‘Strong Climate Effect’
> - The Rain in Spain Stays Mainly in the Plain. Or Does It?
> - Tibet is Warming at Twice Global Average
> - Earthquake "Swarm" Strikes Africa
> - Humans ‘Affect Global Rainfall’
> - Mysteries of Antarctic Mountains Revealed
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Earth Observatory weekly mailing -- earthobservatory.nasa.gov
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: eo-announce-unsubscribe@eodomo.gsfc.nasa.gov
> For additional commands, e-mail: eo-announce-help@eodomo.gsfc.nasa.gov

I think us folks with MySpace accounts should add these videos to their MySpace pages. The irony of FoxAttacks ads running on Fox-owned MySpace would be delicious ...

Fox is full of crap, i feel sick when i see fox news, its just full of total crap, about globalwarming, war...etc sorry guyz i am not from US but i feel relly relly sorry about you, i dont know any other nation where u have to see/listen this kinda of crap :/

most of US ppls are brainwashed by this shiti daytime tv

Wow. Rather pathetic editing job there. But hey, I am sure you would have done just as poorly back in the 70's when all of the science communities were claiming a new ice age, warning of global cooling, and thinking up ways to heat up the planet.

I guess what was going on 30 years ago was just an "ooops" because we all know that for the past 50 years it has only been getting hotter. And everyone has always agreed to that "fact".

But you just keep on editing. Would love to see the cuts about China, and how those that back the idea of Man Made Global Warming are giving them a pass for all of the pollution they create. One new coal based electric power plant starting up every 2 weeks over there. Time for you all to psssst... do something about China if you really believe in Man Made Global Warming right?

I won't hold my breath.

It's about time an effective counterpoint to Fox "News" was launched. Their lies, hate-mongering, distortions, ad hominem attacks, and factual cherry-picking are beyond all credibility. It saddens me that there are those sufficiently gullible to actually believe Fox Noise propaganda. I'm glad to join the battle.

Frankly I can't stand to watch Fox. It makes me
sick. But if I happen to watch a program, I'll
contact local advertisers and will report.

Great new approach!!!

Fox News is a Traitor's network spewing Lies and disinformation and the CEO should be Jailed

Sharon: If you are having trouble with YouTube, you can download a Quicktime version of this video here: gobnf.org -- or even download the audio in mp3 here: gobnf.org

Look, knowing the track record of Fox Broadcasting, I would be happy to help you guys out. But I cannot get YouTube to play on my dial up access. Therefore, if I can access via transcrips, or some other means and hear what they are saying I'll be glad to do my part to publicize their lies.