New liberal game. Let's play. Soros says

Soros says raise your LEFT hand.
Good. Good.
Put your hand down.
You group in the back. Your out. George didn't say.
Now for the tie breaker.
Soroz says head up your ass.
Look at all the liberals tied for the win.

mikey,
if msnbc is "far left" as you claim, then you should be able to provide us with links proving your claim. if not, you're nothing more than a talking point conspiratist with nothing to add to this equation

Michael, which "liberal" MSNBC regulars are you talking about? Joe Scarborough? Tucker Carlson? Pat Buchanan? Frightingly left wing aren't they.

FYI - The 130-150 million conservatives figure is based on recent elections which showed the country about split in half ideologically. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and didn't take into account GOP election fraud.Fair and balanced, that's me!

Its time that these people realize that the postings be it left or right are from REAL PEOPLE, their electorate and that they should listen instead of smearing.

John,
"So anyway, you might ask, well, why doesn't a "liberal" network have the viewership that Fox does. Two reasons."

Well why are the liberals deserting their peers on the oh so non-biased pure fact, liberal news shows? Doesn't make sense. You don't consider MSNBC as far left as FOX is right? Do you have liberal blinders on?

I don't know where you got your 130-150 million figures at. I can assure you that the liberals are not the only ones on the Internet and that the conservative blogs are as and probably more numerous.

"Wrestling fans watch wrestling, Nascar fans watch Nascar, Star Trek fans watch Star Trek and right-wingers watch Fox right?"

What do liberals watch? Include the neofilth types as well please. Trying to stereotype conservatives? It wont work and STOP YELLING! You will burst a blood vessel if you keep getting so worked up.

"THERE ARE NO LIBERALS "NEWS" NETWORKS. They tell us the news!"

The whole news, the only true news and nothing but the news! Your statement is a lesson on cultist followers and is absolutely ridiculous.

Michael, there are 300 million people in this country and perhaps, 130-150 million of them are conservative.

Since Fox is a biased, right-wing editorial mouthpiece for conservatives it would stand to reason that they would have a large audience. Wrestling fans watch wrestling, Nascar fans watch Nascar, Star Trek fans watch Star Trek and right-wingers watch Fox right?

Now, if you could show us statistics that prove that an equal number of people that watch Fox are liberal, then you might have some ground to stand on. But, you can't. So the logical consclusion to be drawn is that Fox has a large audience of conservative viewers! Wow! earthshattering info!

So anyway, you might ask, well, why doesn't a "liberal" network have the viewership that Fox does. Two reasons.

1. More and more liberals (statistics show) now get their news from the internet and there are no reliable Neilson statistics to quantify or qualify affiliation on the web.

2. THERE ARE NO LIBERALS "NEWS" NETWORKS. They tell us the news! Not what the White House and Roger Ailes want us to hear.

what's the matter mikey, couldn't develop a rational retort to the "censorship" issue?

Neo-filth I didn't know that it always floats. I thought that was just if you were unhealthy. I guess you would know about being unhealthy and...crude. You don't even fit in with these socio-paths. You don't fit in anywhere and the only "shit" is what is coming from your feeble little mind. So why not just give it up...

"Fox will be floating long after this blogs demise."

for once you are 100% correct mikey, shit always "floats

mikey,
you and your ilk like to scream "censorship" which, looking at the context of your argument makes ZERO sense, leading us to believe you don't even know the meaning of censorship. Was the word "censorship" the keyword on the o'reilly report? No one is saying faux opinion channel doesn't have the RIGHT to broadcast. Let them continue on any path they wish but, expect pressure to be exerted on their advertisers.

My dear Nicho, No one has been more scrutinized than Fox. Fox seems to welcome the scrutiny. What a dream you have that they will be rendered impotent by the main stream media. Only in your dreams. The truth is their viewership is several times more than the main stream and other cable news shows combined.

And if you don't call trying to intimidate a sponsor (who never was a sponsor) attempted (and failed) censorship then what is?

Cash fear and lies? Certainly cash LOL...the news reporting from their news anchors are the most balanced you can find. Either reporting facts or offering both sides of an issue. The majority of Americans obviously agree or Fox wouldn't be hands down #1. Jump on MSNBC or Air America's sinking ship and go down with it like a sailor. Fox will be floating long after this blogs demise.

Dearest Michael,
foxnews has now invited scrutiny with their hysterical attacks on high-reasoning individuals, it is only reasonable for them to respond. No-one is trying to censor fox, fox will eventually be rendered irrelevent by the scrutiny of mainstream media, this is only the beginning of the end for fox and their paranoid/hateful rantings. The tragic irony...they screamed and begged for this scrutiny themselves. Cash, fear and lies can't buy the truth, my ignorant, ignorant friend. and ultimately that's all they have to fall back on.

Wow! All I can say is Duuhhh which way did they go George

mikey,
it's called good business sense, it's the power of the dollar. you lose

I didn't see any love for foxattackers at all. They either just stated the facts or quoted Home Depots sensible replies. They pretty much all trashed your goofy censorship movement.