I think that what the last poster meant that the "wimen" on Fox don't wear pants because clothing is empowering. It's also a way of saying that you're off-limits when it comes to sexual innuendos and suggestions.

Reading a lot of comments here, but what all this ultimately comes down to is: People like Kravis, Bush, Cheney. They seem to have no moral values. It's all about them; all about how they can enrich themselves.
Do you think for a moment that these are Christian values, although they have aligned themselves with the Neo-Con, Christian movement?
Come on.... These are guys who are ought there for themselves. They don't care about you or your petty problems. And you sheep think this is absolutely wonderful.
Have you ever met George W. Bush? Have you ever met Dick Cheney? Have you ever met Henry Kravis or that sick family that runs Clear Channel?
Of course you haven't, so why do you identify with them?
Do you poor schmucks think that if you champion them you'll be included in their inner circle? Dream on....

I've always been amazed by the lack of interest in the greatest source of energy - the sun!
It's a chilly day, but I just opened the blinds and watched the thermostat rise due to the heat from the sun. Why are we dragging our feet? It's obvious that the sun, for as long as it's energy boils down on us, is a tremendous source of energy. The wind, the tides, are equally useful.
I can't legally harness these methods of energy. The rights to the sun, to the wind, to the waters have been sold off to corporations who charge us for what should be free.
Rather than championing corporations who will use these energy sources, maybe we should be wondering why the individual can't harness these resources for his/her own benefit, without paying the initial corporation and the taxes upon taxes which seem necessary to get this energy into our homes.
Sallie

Why not send these people one of those terrible Christmas messages that some families seem impelled to circulate:
It looks like little Johnny (JJ) will get his braces this year and Susan is a lock to dance the role of the Sugar Plum Fairy in Mrs. Dumas' yearly production of The Nutcracker. We couldn't be prouder!
Tom got a sizeable raise in his second job and it looks like we might be able to buy a bigger house. Halleluha! Sue and JJ will have their own rooms!!!! I've never thought that 12-year-olds and 10-year-olds of different sexes should have to share a room, much less a bed.
I'm looking into several work-from-home offers I've received on the internet. Think it might be worth my while to take a few classes so that I can work as a medical billing specialist. Don't have to tell you that my last job was a minus, what with the need for a second car and gas and business clothes and after-school care.
Hey! One day we woke up and said, "It's costing us more for me to work than to stay at home!"
But, this looks like a good thing. Tom could actually quit his second job and get more than 5 hours sleep (which he says he doesn't mind, the cutie). So, all you dear friends and relatives, things are looking up for us!
I have all the confidence in the world that the economy is booming. If you can't trust the POTUS on this, who can you trust?
All my love always,
Sallie

Perhaps I misunderstood the premise. What would I do if I spent the holidays in a Kravis house, or what would I do if I OWNED a Kravis house? The dichotomy makes all the difference in the world.
If I could legally spend the holidays in a Kravis house, I'd go out and find homeless people and give them a taste of the good life for as long as I could. If I OWNED the house,I'd have it demolished because such places have no reason to exist.