<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>chinese exclusion at Brave New Films</title>
  <link href="http://bravenewfilms.org/topics/chinese-exclusion" rel="self"/>
  <id>http://bravenewfilms.org/topics/chinese-exclusion</id>
  <updated>2008-05-13T22:58:06Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Marking The Anniversary of 'Illegal Immigration'</title>
    <link href="http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/38030-marking-the-anniversary-of-illegal-immigration" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/38030-marking-the-anniversary-of-illegal-immigration</id>
    <updated>2008-05-13T22:58:06Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DREAMActivist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">



&lt;a href="http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/38030-marking-the-anniversary-of-illegal-immigration"&gt;&lt;img src="http://bravenewfilms.org/pictures/thumbnail_pic/42961" style="border: solid 1px black; margin-right: 7px; margin-top: 3px;" align="left" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;div class="post_content"&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May 6, 1882 is the date for the birth of &amp;#39;illegal immigration.&amp;#39; Like most social concerns that are only deemed as a &amp;#39;problem&amp;#39; when it benefits the state, the immigration of Chinese laborers to the United States, the so-called &amp;#39;yellow peril&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Asian invasion&amp;#39; now required &amp;#39;documentation.&amp;#39; The Chinese were constructed as unassimilable peoples, not eligible for citizenship under the &lt;a href="http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/chinex.htm"&gt;Chinese Exclusion Act of&amp;nbsp; 1882&lt;/a&gt;. The Act also restricted Chinese immigration by excluding Chinese laborers from entering the country for the next 10 years under penalty of deportation and imprisonment. This would pave the way for more codes and statutes restricting Chinese immigration:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;S 6 (22 Stat. 58, . 120), provides that every Chinese person other  than a laborer, who may be entitled to come  within the United States, shall produce a prescribed certificate of his identity and of his right to enter: and Act July 5, 1884, provides  that this certificate &amp;quot;shall be the sole evidence &lt;br /&gt;permissible on the part of the person so producing the same to establish a right of entry into the United States.&amp;quot; Act Oct. 1. 18X8. prohibits any Chinese laborer who had been, or was then,  or might hereafter be, a resident within the  United States, and who had departed or might  depart therefrom, to return to or remain in the  United States. Held, that since the passage of the latter act no Chinese person, formerly resident in the United States but temporarily absent &lt;br /&gt;therefrom, is entitled to return without the &lt;br /&gt;prescribed certificate.&amp;mdash;Wan Shing v. United &lt;br /&gt;State&amp;raquo;, 140 U. S. 424. 11 S. Ct. 729, 35 L. Ed. 03. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What led to the enacted of Chinese exclusion? Was it working class fears of Chinese immigrants taking their jobs (as is the excuse given today) or simply sheer racism that the anti-illegal immigrant lobby denies in contemporary times? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


  &lt;a href="/blog/38030-marking-the-anniversary-of-illegal-immigration"&gt;Continue reading&lt;/a&gt;
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
