IPCC at Brave New Films

Are Humans to Blame for Global Warming?

2008-10-06T18:49:48Z

Complete video at: fora.tv

Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, Chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and Mary Nichols, Chair of the California Air Resources Board, dismiss skeptics' claims that humans are not contributing to global warming.

-----

California is a leader in the fight against dangerous climate change. But experts say more needs to be done. Much more.

What is the state of scientific knowledge about the causes and impacts of global warming? How can the U.S. and fast-growing economies such as China and India reduce carbon emissions to safe levels? Can California consumers, corporations and policymakers facilitate systemic change and spur others to act?

What are the costs and what are the opportunities? What role does innovation play? - The Commonwealth Club of California

Rajendra Kumar Pachauri (born August 20, 1940, Nainital, India) is an economist and environmental scientist who has served as the chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) since 2002. Pachauri is also the director general of the Energy and Resources Institute in New Delhi, an institution devoted to researching and promoting sustainable development. On December 10, 2007, Dr. Pachauri accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the IPCC, along with co-recipient Al Gore.

Mary D. Nichols was appointed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger as Chairman of the California Air Resources Board in July 2007. She returns to the Air Board 30 years after serving as the Chairman under Governor Jerry Brown from 1978 to 1983

Watch the video

Documentary about 2007 Nobel Peace Prize Laureates

2008-10-08T00:18:30Z

"
Here is a short excerpt from documentary about the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, Al Gore and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change. For the complete documentary, visit: nobelprize.org "

Watch the video

Telephone Interview with Nobel Laureate in Peace 2007, IPCC

2008-10-08T00:18:31Z

Telephone interview excerpt with 2007 Nobel Peace Laureate IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) represented by the chairman R.K. Pachauri. He reflects on what the Nobel Peace Prize means for the IPCC and the world regarding the importance of climate change. For the complete interview, visit: nobelprize.org

Watch the video

The 2007 Nobel Peace Prize goes to ...

2008-10-08T00:18:33Z

The Norwegian Nobel Committee awards the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize to IPCC and Al Gore for "their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change".

Watch the video

The 2007 Nobel Peace Prize

2008-10-08T00:18:33Z

Following the announcement of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, Geir Lundestad, Secretary of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, explains why climate change is connected with war and peace. See the official announcement and presentation in full at nobelprize.org

Watch the video

Greenpeace reminds the world its time to quit coal

2008-06-14T03:30:22Z

Watch the video

New IPCC Report Finds Climate Change Accelerating-US Finds Report Lacking

2008-06-14T15:30:40Z

As detailed in a television report today on the BBC, the Earth is racing toward a warmer climate at a quickening pace according to a report released today by the International Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC, the Nobel Prize winning U.N. scientific body and respected authority on climate change warns of inevitable human suffering and the threat of extinction for some species. However the United States repeatedly challenged passages emphasizing the level of threat posed by climate change, objecting that the wording was imprecise.

Jim Connaughton, chairman of White House's Council on Environmental Quality said,

The scientific definition of the dangers of climate change is lacking, and so we are operating within the construct of, again, strong agreement among world leaders that urgent action is warranted.

However, the report was adopted by consensus, meaning countries accept the underlying science and cannot disavow its conclusions. It is based on thousands of pages of data and computer models from six years of research compiled by the IPCC.

Quoting the IPCC report,

As early as 2020, 75 million to 250 million people in Africa will suffer water shortages, residents of Asia's mega-cities will be at great risk of river and coastal flooding, Europeans can expect extensive species loss, and North Americans will experience longer and hotter heat waves and greater competition for water.

Especially disturbing was the report expressing concern that the poor and the elderly will suffer most from climate change; that hunger and disease will be more common; that droughts, floods and heat waves will afflict the world's poorest regions; and that more animal and plant species will vanish. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon who had just been to see ice shelves breaking up in Antarctica and the melting Torres del Paine glaciers in Chile said,

The potential impact of global warming is so severe and so sweeping that only urgent, global action will do. Today the world’s scientists have spoken, clearly and in one voice.

In an especially strong rebuke to largely discredited global warming deniers, IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri contributed this,

When you're on strong scientific ground, you don't yield any ground. We have to make sure that scientific truth is not suppressed.

Yet, the Bush administration tried to make some changes in the report that were inconsistent with the consensus of the majority. Dr. Sharon Hays, leader of the US delegation said.

The goal was not political but to make sure the final report matches the science.

But Stephanie Tunmore, with Greenpeace International who was an official observer said that was not the case. She said the United States attempted to remove part of the report called ‘Reasons for Concern’ that presented many consequences of global warming referred to as either likely or possible, including the melting of ice sheets. Thankfully scientific knowledge and commitment prevailed and the information remained.

Of course, while Europe has relentlessly pursued the enforcement of the carbon emission targets outlined in the Kyoto treaty, the US along with China, refused to sign the accord. President Bush favors a voluntary agreement. Translation for those of you who do not speak immoral neo-con; Bush is unwilling to commit this country to trying to avoid the devastating consequences of climate change. Why? Because that stands in conflict with the greed and avarice of his corporate benefactors who are reluctant to spend the money it would take to clean up their polluting, carbon emission spewing ways and to invest in new clean technology. In essence Bush is saying, we do not care about what scientists say is an impending disaster. Making money for the wealthy is more important.

The conservative perspective on global warming in the United States as embraced by the Bush administration is disastrous for the American people and the world. No longer can we be allowed to make decisions that seek to benefit the status quo, the wealthy powerful corporate interests at the expense of the health of our planet and the world. The momentum for change is building to a crescendo and hopefully after January 1st, 2009 we will be a moral leader in that effort.

Watch the video

Avaaz.org - Climate Wake Up Call

2008-08-06T06:35:25Z

This is a new TV ad by www.Avaaz.org - an online community of global citizens who take action on the major issues facing the world today. The ad will be airing in key world capitals in February to tell our leaders to wake up. We need your help to make them hear us - got to www.Avaaz.org to add your voice to our campaign.

Watch the video