<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>nonresident at Brave New Films</title>
  <link href="http://bravenewfilms.org/topics/nonresident" rel="self"/>
  <id>http://bravenewfilms.org/topics/nonresident</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T01:07:19Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Debate Over In-state Tuition for Undocumented Students - FAQs - Part 2</title>
    <link href="http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/42997-the-debate-over-in-state-tuition-for-undocumented-students-faqs-part-2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/42997-the-debate-over-in-state-tuition-for-undocumented-students-faqs-part-2</id>
    <updated>2008-07-02T01:07:19Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DREAMActivist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">



&lt;a href="http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/42997-the-debate-over-in-state-tuition-for-undocumented-students-faqs-part-2"&gt;&lt;img src="http://bravenewfilms.org/pictures/thumbnail_pic/48561" style="border: solid 1px black; margin-right: 7px; margin-top: 3px;" align="left" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;div class="post_content"&gt;

&lt;p&gt;  &lt;p class="loose"&gt;Part 1 is &lt;a href="../../blog/42906-the-debate-over-instate-tuition-challenges-and-affirmation-part-1"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="loose"&gt;&lt;span class="verdana"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Do individual states have the right to &amp;ldquo;establish reasonable criteria&amp;rdquo; for in-state tuition&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="verdana"&gt;&lt;span&gt;? In &lt;u&gt;Goodhart v. Bd. Of Visitors&lt;/u&gt;, the District Court for the Western District of Virginia ruled that a state had a legitimate interest in protecting the right of its bona fide residents to attend its colleges and universities on a preferential basis. &amp;ldquo;Preferential tuition rates serve not just legitimate, but important, state interests.&amp;rdquo; The decision upheld a resolution by a university in Virginia not to grant instate tuition to a student from Georgia who had moved there for higher education and claimed to remain indefinitely. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="loose"&gt;&lt;span class="verdana"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Does 8 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 1623 prevent states from granting instate tuition to undocumented students?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="verdana"&gt;&lt;span&gt; Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (Title 8, Chapter 14, Sec. 1623(a)) states: &amp;quot;an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident.&amp;quot; Some interpret this law to mean that instate-tuition for undocumented students is unconstitutional&amp;mdash;the Courts have thus far skirted around the issue. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


  &lt;a href="/blog/42997-the-debate-over-in-state-tuition-for-undocumented-students-faqs-part-2"&gt;Continue reading&lt;/a&gt;
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
