vote fraud at Brave New Films

But is it authentic, let alone intimidating?

2008-10-04T13:23:50Z

A flyer making the rounds of certain Philadelphia neighbourhoods populated heavily by the poor and National Minorities is somehow designed to serve no useful purpose but that of intimidation vis-a-vis exercise of the electoral franchise.

As the Philadelphia Daily News reporteth:

With just weeks to go before the presidential election, voter intimidation has reared its ugly head.
An anonymous flier circulating in African-American neighborhoods in North and West Philadelphia states that voters who are facing outstanding arrest warrants or who have unpaid traffic tickets may be arrested at the polls on Election Day.
Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Everett Gillison, who learned of the flier last week, said that the message is completely false.
"The only thing that police officers are going to do that we'll be encouraging that day is that they'll be exercising their own individual right to vote," Gillison said.
He plans to put up statements on the city and police Web sites to let citizens know that the handouts are false. He said that he also will record a public-service announcement for broadcast.
Gillison referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney's Office and the district attorney.
"We are not going to stand for any intimidation of voters," Gillison said. "Not in this city."
He said that he did not know who was behind the fliers, which appear to be targeted at supporters of Democratic candidate Barack Obama.
But telling people to beware of voting if they have outstanding warrants is an old trick. In Maryland's 2002 gubernatorial election, anonymous fliers in African-American communities warned people to pay parking tickets and resolve outstanding warrants before heading to the polls.
"It seems to be clearly aimed at lower-income voters that might have had some problems in the past and clearly aimed at discouraging people from voting," said Zack Stalberg, who heads the political-watchdog group Committee of Seventy.
Stalberg said that he feared that there could be more fliers to come.
"I'm a little surprised it appeared this far before Election Day," he said. "It's another indication of how dirty this election might become."
Local NAACP President Jerry Mondesire said that he was aware of the flier and would be watching for other intimidation efforts, but would wait until closer to Election Day to reach out to the public.
"We probably will do something closer to the election," he said. "People tend not to pay attention until two weeks out."
Mondesire said that he didn't know who was circulating the fliers, but added, "I do know one thing for sure: They're not Democrats."

In any case, such campaigns, or related conspiracies, should not be taken lying down; rather, they should be timely reported to law-enforcement channels. Those standing in the way are just as guilty as those behind these nefarious "patriotic" exercises.

==========================

"Don't let 'em fool you, bro; read (and shop) The Exaggerator @ any and every online opportunity...." (Now with its own CafePress-powered e-boutique, The Exaggerator Collection)

Primary Vote Fraud 2008, Part 4

2008-06-12T09:30:58Z

Part 4 of a 4-part News on News broadcast documenting news coverage of vote fraud concerns during the 2008 presidential primaries.

Watch the video

Primary Vote Fraud 2008, Part 3

2008-06-12T09:30:56Z

Part 3 of a 4-part News on News broadcast documenting news coverage of vote fraud concerns during the 2008 presidential primaries.

Watch the video

Primary Vote Fraud 2008, Part 2

2008-06-12T09:30:55Z

Part 2 of a 4-part News on News broadcast documenting news coverage of vote fraud concerns during the 2008 presidential primaries.

Watch the video

Primary Vote Fraud 2008, Part 1

2008-06-12T09:30:55Z

First of a 4-part News on News broadcast documenting news coverage of vote fraud concerns during the 2008 presidential primaries.

Watch the video

Saving America in 10 minutes

2008-06-10T15:36:02Z

Discovering the obvious Most citizens would be amazed at the personal benefit we would all derive if we simply elected a president that upheld our Constitution. All we need to do is vote for a presidential candidate in the primary election that has a proven record of upholding our constitution, and stop voting for the lesser of two evils. All too many times we have actually been electing criminals. Which makes us accomplices to their crimes. Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913, not one president since has upheld our Constitution. Mainstream corporate media marginalizes and excludes those who would uphold our Constitution insuring that they do not get elected. You can now change that. We could not have a greater motivation.

Watch the video

Lier's and the Lies the Lie

2008-06-10T15:36:35Z

Watch the video

South Carolina, Super Tuesday, and Ron Paul

2008-06-10T15:31:56Z

Watch the video

Disturbing Info Continues To Come Out On Voting Procedures/Counting

2008-06-09T09:37:03Z

Many people may not know that our old friends Diebold were involved in the counting of New Hampshire ballots:

What's going on here? Before proceeding, I recommend you read the third section of the post I just ran an hour or so ago, concerning the way the ballots are counted in New Hampshire, largely on Diebold optical-scan voting systems, wholly controlled and programmed by a very very bad company named LHS Associates.
Those Diebold op-scan machines are the exact same ones that were hacked in the HBO documentary, Hacking Democracy. See the previous report, as I recommend, which also includes a video of that hack, and footage of the guy who runs LHS Associates.

I am not suggesting anything here. But Jesus, is it too much to ask that when you vote in a democracy, you have confidence in the results? In many states either completely or partially controlled by Democrats, they are allowing this kind of corporate unacountability to continue. It is a disgrace.

One man, a contractor named John Silvestro, will have unbelievable control over the process in states such as Connecticut, Vermont and Massachusetts. So if any of these three reliably blue states go red in November, you'll know why....just watch the video.

Watch the video

NOW: Will The 2008 Vote Be Fair? (1 of 2)

2008-10-14T21:29:58Z

11.30.07

Watch the video

NOW: Will The 2008 Vote Be Fair? (2 of 2)

2008-06-08T09:33:50Z

11.30.07

Watch the video

Rep. Wexler Grills AG Going Going Gonzo

2008-06-09T03:31:24Z

Florida Rep. Wexler shreds Attorney General Gonzales.

Watch the video